89R10268 AMF-F
By: Plesa
H.B. No. 2086
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to a motion for determining a plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 11.051, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11.051. MOTION FOR ORDER DETERMINING PLAINTIFF A
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT AND REQUESTING SECURITY. In a litigation in
this state, [the defendant may,] on or before the 90th day after the
date the defendant files the original answer or makes a special
appearance:
(1) the defendant may file a motion requesting[, move
the court for] an order:
(A) [(1)] determining that the plaintiff is a
vexatious litigant; and
(B) [(2)] requiring the plaintiff to furnish
security; or
(2) the court on its own motion may conduct a hearing
under Section 11.053 to determine whether to issue an order finding
that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
SECTION 2. Section 11.052(a), Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) On the filing of a motion under Section 11.051, the
litigation is stayed and a [the moving] defendant subject to the
motion is not required to plead:
(1) if the motion is denied, before the 10th day after
the date it is denied; or
(2) if the motion is granted, before the 10th day after
the date the moving defendant receives written notice that the
plaintiff has furnished the required security.
SECTION 3. Section 11.053(a), Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) On filing [receipt] of a motion under Section 11.051,
the court shall, after notice to all parties, conduct a hearing to
determine whether to grant the motion.
SECTION 4. Section 11.054, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11.054. CRITERIA FOR FINDING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS
LITIGANT. A court may find a plaintiff a vexatious litigant if [the
defendant shows that] there is not a reasonable probability that
the plaintiff will prevail in the litigation against the defendant
and that:
(1) the plaintiff, in the seven-year period
immediately preceding the date [the defendant makes] the motion is
filed under Section 11.051, has commenced, prosecuted, or
maintained at least five litigations as a pro se litigant other than
in a small claims court that have been:
(A) finally determined adversely to the
plaintiff;
(B) permitted to remain pending at least two
years without having been brought to trial or hearing; or
(C) determined by a trial or appellate court to
be frivolous or groundless under state or federal laws or rules of
procedure;
(2) after a litigation has been finally determined
against the plaintiff, the plaintiff repeatedly relitigates or
attempts to relitigate, pro se, either:
(A) the validity of the determination against the
same defendant as to whom the litigation was finally determined; or
(B) the cause of action, claim, controversy, or
any of the issues of fact or law determined or concluded by the
final determination against the same defendant as to whom the
litigation was finally determined; or
(3) the plaintiff has previously been declared to be a
vexatious litigant by a state or federal court in an action or
proceeding based on the same or substantially similar facts,
transition, or occurrence.
SECTION 5. Sections 11.055(a) and (c), Civil Practice and
Remedies Code, are amended to read as follows:
(a) A court shall order the plaintiff to furnish security
for the benefit of a [the] moving defendant if the court, after
hearing the evidence on the defendant’s motion, determines that the
plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
(c) The court shall provide that the security is an
undertaking by the plaintiff to assure payment to a [the] moving
defendant of the moving defendant’s reasonable expenses incurred in
or in connection with a litigation commenced, caused to be
commenced, maintained, or caused to be maintained by the plaintiff,
including costs and attorney’s fees.
SECTION 6. Section 11.057, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11.057. DISMISSAL ON THE MERITS. If the litigation is
dismissed on its merits, a [the] moving defendant has recourse to
the security furnished by the plaintiff in an amount determined by
the court.
SECTION 7. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to
an action commencing on or after or pending on the effective date of
this Act.
SECTION 8. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.
Share this post:
HB 2086
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Submitted to the Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
For HB 2086
Biography: Rep. Plesa, Mihaela
Rep. Plesa, Mihaela
Representative Mihaela Plesa is a lifelong Texan who is proud to serve the residents of Texas House District 70, which covers parts of Dallas, Plano, Richardson, and Allen. She is the first-generation daughter of Romanian immigrants who fled Eastern Europe to pursue the American Dream. Representative Plesa is proud to be the first democratic woman elected to represent Collin County in the Texas Legislature and the first Romanian-American elected in the great state of Texas.
Now in her second term as State Representative, Plesa was elected the Vice Chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus and appointed Vice Chair of the House Committee on Pensions, Investments, and Financial Services. She also serves on the Elections Committee and was recently awarded the Outstanding Democratic Woman award from the Texas Democratic Women. Her priorities currently include fully funding our schools, reducing property taxes, and improving public safety.
During her first Legislative Session, Representative Plesa passed legislation to crack down on illegal street racing, made it easier for seniors to receive IDs, and increased funding for ECI (Early Childhood Intervention) by $6.2 million, the first increase in 10 years. She was awarded the Legislative Study Group Freshman of the Year in 2023.
Rep. Mihaela Plesa owned and operated her own small business in fashion merchandising and design, focusing on Texas-made products while helping other entrepreneurs start and grow their own small businesses. Before running for the Texas House, Plesa served as a legislative director for three regular sessions and four special sessions. During her tenure as a legislative director, Plesa worked to pass legislation that expanded the Texas Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Task Force, expanded Medicaid, and passed a constitutional amendment to deliver property tax exemptions to gold star families. Representative Plesa is proud to stand on her legislative record of bipartisan achievements for the people of Texas.
Rep. Plesa is the proud product of Texas public schools. She earned her high school diploma from Newman Smith High School, her bachelor’s degree from the University of North Texas, and her master’s degree from Southern Methodist University.
Biography: Rep. Campos, Elizabeth "Liz"
Rep. Campos, Elizabeth “Liz”
Biography
Representative Elizabeth “Liz” Campos of House District 119 is serving her third term in the Texas House of Representatives. As a lifelong resident of District 119, she represents the cities of San Antonio, Converse, Live Oak, Schertz, St. Hedwig, and Universal City.
In her first term, Representative Campos was selected as “Freshman of the Year” by the Texas House Legislative Study Group. This session, Representative Campos has worked to improve the Department of Family and Protective Services by advocating for stronger resources and more efficient support systems to protect vulnerable children and families. She also leads mental health initiatives, especially for firefighters and peace officers, recognizing the unique challenges these first responders face and the critical need for specialized mental health care.
Campos has authored legislation to increase accessibility to physician assistant care, expanding healthcare options for communities across Texas. She has made efforts in the capitol to provide more comprehensive support for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, ensuring they receive the services and opportunities they need to thrive.
Recognizing the importance of quality care for seniors, Campos pushes for improved staffing standards at facilities that care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease or related disorders, ensuring that these vulnerable populations receive the attention and care they deserve.
In addition to advancing her legislation, she also worked to expand Medicaid, fully fund public schools, and finance local infrastructure projects that generate jobs, create opportunity, and reduce poverty in our community.
Representative Campos is the first woman elected to represent HD 119. She has over thirty years of experience as a legal administrator at major law firms in San Antonio and previously served in the Texas Legislature as a House Constituent Coordinator, Senate District Director, and Senate Chief of Staff.
As well as serving her community in the Texas House of Representatives, Liz Campos is a successful businesswoman, a third-generation plumber, and lives in Southeast San Antonio with her three German Shepherds Jojo, Jolene, and Lobo.
Who Voted Aye?
The Bill Would Allow Pre-Motion Hearings, Similar to That Introduced in Dispositive Motions in Federal Court to Expedite Dismissal of Case at the Beginning of Proceedings
89R10268 AMF-F
By: Plesa
H.B. No. 2086
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to a motion for determining a plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 11.051, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11.051. MOTION FOR ORDER DETERMINING PLAINTIFF A
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT AND REQUESTING SECURITY. In a litigation in
this state, [the defendant may,] on or before the 90th day after the
date the defendant files the original answer or makes a special
appearance:
(1) the defendant may file a motion requesting[, move
the court for] an order:
(A) [(1)] determining that the plaintiff is a
vexatious litigant; and
(B) [(2)] requiring the plaintiff to furnish
security; or
(2) the court on its own motion may conduct a hearing
under Section 11.053 to determine whether to issue an order finding
that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
SECTION 2. Section 11.052(a), Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) On the filing of a motion under Section 11.051, the
litigation is stayed and a [the moving] defendant subject to the
motion is not required to plead:
(1) if the motion is denied, before the 10th day after
the date it is denied; or
(2) if the motion is granted, before the 10th day after
the date the moving defendant receives written notice that the
plaintiff has furnished the required security.
SECTION 3. Section 11.053(a), Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) On filing [receipt] of a motion under Section 11.051,
the court shall, after notice to all parties, conduct a hearing to
determine whether to grant the motion.
SECTION 4. Section 11.054, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11.054. CRITERIA FOR FINDING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS
LITIGANT. A court may find a plaintiff a vexatious litigant if [the
defendant shows that] there is not a reasonable probability that
the plaintiff will prevail in the litigation against the defendant
and that:
(1) the plaintiff, in the seven-year period
immediately preceding the date [the defendant makes] the motion is
filed under Section 11.051, has commenced, prosecuted, or
maintained at least five litigations as a pro se litigant other than
in a small claims court that have been:
(A) finally determined adversely to the
plaintiff;
(B) permitted to remain pending at least two
years without having been brought to trial or hearing; or
(C) determined by a trial or appellate court to
be frivolous or groundless under state or federal laws or rules of
procedure;
(2) after a litigation has been finally determined
against the plaintiff, the plaintiff repeatedly relitigates or
attempts to relitigate, pro se, either:
(A) the validity of the determination against the
same defendant as to whom the litigation was finally determined; or
(B) the cause of action, claim, controversy, or
any of the issues of fact or law determined or concluded by the
final determination against the same defendant as to whom the
litigation was finally determined; or
(3) the plaintiff has previously been declared to be a
vexatious litigant by a state or federal court in an action or
proceeding based on the same or substantially similar facts,
transition, or occurrence.
SECTION 5. Sections 11.055(a) and (c), Civil Practice and
Remedies Code, are amended to read as follows:
(a) A court shall order the plaintiff to furnish security
for the benefit of a [the] moving defendant if the court, after
hearing the evidence on the defendant’s motion, determines that the
plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
(c) The court shall provide that the security is an
undertaking by the plaintiff to assure payment to a [the] moving
defendant of the moving defendant’s reasonable expenses incurred in
or in connection with a litigation commenced, caused to be
commenced, maintained, or caused to be maintained by the plaintiff,
including costs and attorney’s fees.
SECTION 6. Section 11.057, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11.057. DISMISSAL ON THE MERITS. If the litigation is
dismissed on its merits, a [the] moving defendant has recourse to
the security furnished by the plaintiff in an amount determined by
the court.
SECTION 7. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to
an action commencing on or after or pending on the effective date of
this Act.
SECTION 8. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.
Weaponizing The All Writs Act: By Targeting Specific Litigants Federal Courts are Behaving Tyrannically
LIT Examines the Yolanda Frank-Broussard Landmark 2023 Case That Set the Framework for Judicial Targeting in Houston Federal Court.
How Federal Courts Weaponized the All Writs Act to Silence Homeowners and Violate Constitutional Rights
LIT Exposes How Federal Courts Use the All Writs Act to Control Litigants and Conceal Real Estate Fraud by Bandit Lawyers and Their Clients.
The Lakes at Mason Park HOA Quickly Forecloses on Legal Bandit Vilt’s Former Clients as Nationstar Sues
The Solomon’s have been in financial distress as far back as 2011, with intervening bankruptcies and HUD loan mods they cannot repay.
No Bull. Just Real News and Facts.
GET LIT NEWS DELIVERED DIRECT
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE IN LESS THAN 10 SECONDS
Help Make a Difference
Share this post:
Recommended for you