OPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
FEB 27, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 27, 2023
MARCH 8, 2023
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
(SUA SPONTE ORDER TO DENY TIME TO REPLY INCLUDING A 3 JUDGE ORDER ISSUED)
Before King, Jones, and Smith, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s opposed motion to transfer this appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals is DENIED.
The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has processed the recently widowed, elder Appellant’s appeal, assigned the appellate case number and noticed March 20, 2023 as the deadline for submission of the Appellant’s Brief.
On February 17, 2023, Appellant, Joanna Burke, requested this appeal be transferred to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the “interests of justice”.
On February 23, 2023, Appellees submitted a motion for an extension of time to respond to the Appellant’s request for venue transfer which this court has granted and extended until February 6, 2023.
Appellant today, February 27, 2023, timely requests this court extend the briefing schedule for a period of ninety days for the reasons set out in the above motion(s) along with the fact Appellant cannot possibly prepare the opening brief until venue is decided.
Why? Briefs are limited by word-count and the argument presented will be structured based on whether Appellant is addressing the “judicial machinery itself” which directly caused the harm, namely this Circuit, or whether Appellant is addressing an independent Circuit Court which is not familiar with the history and facts of the underlying litigation.
See Judge James Ho’s dissent from only five days ago, admitting and affirming Appellants like Joanna Burke cannot possibly receive a fair and impartial tribunal at the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit;
“Even worse, we’re not just getting the First Amendment backwards. We’re also getting qualified immunity backwards. Just compare the denial of en banc rehearing here with some of our other recent en banc decisions.” Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 21-50276, at *13 (5th Cir. Feb. 22, 2023), and;
“Put simply, “we grant immunity when we should deny-and we deny immunity when we should grant.” Horvath v. City of Leander, 946 F.3d 787, 795 (5th Cir. 2020) (Ho, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part). Indeed, ours is the rare circuit that has been summarily reversed by the Supreme Court for both wrongly granting and wrongly denying qualified immunity.”
Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 21-50276, at *14 (5th Cir. Feb. 22, 2023).
In Appellant’s own case(s), judicial immunity has been granted, when clearly it should have been denied.
CONCLUSION
This motion for an extension of ninety days until Monday, June 20, 2023 should be GRANTED.
Texas Law Professors on Bankruptcy and Civil Rights Won’t Confront Premeditated Judicial Misconduct
Three lauded Texas University law schools employ these academics. Despite their resumes centered on civil rights, they refuse to defend them.
Second Quick-Fire Ruling by Federal Magistrate Judge Challenges Integrity of Her Own Scheduling Order
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
Quick-Fire Ruling by Federal Magistrate Judge Challenges Integrity of Her Own Scheduling Order
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
Federal Court Bailouts: The Troubling Connection Between PHH Mortgage Corp. and Judicial Corruption
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division’s Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism.
Houston Federal Court’s Judicial Order Cloaks the Written Truth and Assaults Ailing Elder Widow
A true and accurate copy of the legal filings presented by Plaintiff has not been uploaded to the docket prior to release of latest order.
Drive-By Hit and Run: Judge Ewing Werlein Jr Defies Courts’ Own Precedent to Absurdly Invent Jurisdiction
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division’s Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism from the bench.
Legal Elder Abuse: Judicial Warfare, Hostility and Ham-Fisted Bullying in Bad Faith
The “Jones Romance Scandal” exemplifies a broader issue in the courthouse, revealing attempts to maintain invented jurisdiction in this case.
Venue Showdown: Exploring Fifth Circuit’s Discordant Rulings on SpaceX and Ft Worth Chamber of Commerce
Parsing Through Legal Friction: SpaceX’s Rejection and Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce Victory in Texas Venue Battles.
Priority Mail: USPS Consistently Loses Time Sensitive Federal Court Filings for Weeks, Not Days
The excessive delays are when legal mailings are sent from Kingwood to the federal court mailing address in Houston, Texas from Joanna Burke.
Operation Elder Abuse: PHH Mortgage Corporation and Deutsche Bank Judge Shopping Continues
Forum Shopping aka Judge Shopping is a disease in Texas courts says Congress, demanding this form of case assignment be outlawed.
Operation Elder Abuse: PHH Mortgage Corp Maintain Admitted Liars Mark and Shelley Hopkins as Counsel
Austin lawyer Mark Hopkins and his spouse, former BDF foreclosure mill lawyer Shelley Hopkins, commit more deception, sanctioned by PHH.
Operation Elder Abuse: Mackie Wolf’s March 5 Bid Report Denial by Catholic Bandit Disingenuous
LIT analyzed prior Bid reports as a comparison and homes which had a bid amount were sold at the auction. LIT also has additional evidence.
