A man walks into “the bar” with a firearm….
Randy Dewayne Pittman appeals his sentence of 51 months in prison, imposed following his guilty plea conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and this court’s remand to the district court to correct the term of supervised release. See United States v. Pittman, 698 F. App’x 175, 176 (5th Cir. 2017).
The Government contends that Pittman’s argument is barred under the mandate rule by this court’s order on remand.
We agree. Although the mandate rule is one of judicial discretion and there can be exceptions, the exceptions do not apply in the instant matter. See United States v. Pineiro, 470 F.3d 200, 205-06 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Lee, 358 F.3d 315, 320-21 (5th Cir. 2004), cf. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Burke, 902 F.3d 548, 551 (5th Cir. 2018).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The motion to expedite the appeal is DENIED as moot.
Flawed Texas Ruling Fuels Unlawful Foreclosures Ripping Away Homeowners’ Stability and Security
Maluski’s Erroneous Statute of Limitations Opinion Adopted by Federal Courts, Leading to the Unlawful Taking of Family Homes.
Convictions of Ex-Texas Mayor and Developer Upheld, Legal Battle Continues While Couple Remain on Bond
Appeals Court Verdict is Vacated in Part, No Doubt to Aid the Extended Time Before these Convicted Felons Actually Report to Prison.
First Class from the Fifth Circuit
Benjamin argues that precedent relied on by the district court does not adequately support difference between first class and certified mail.
#TexasSavesAmerica That would be… Lawyers
Nearly 11,000 Texas firms ranging from an Am Law 200 firm to many solo practitioners received a total of $900 million in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans from the Small Business Administration.
The Citizens Didn’t Get a Dime. pic.twitter.com/XAyMsIgfTe
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 11, 2020
