Public Tensions Increase as the 5th Circuit Court Affirms Sealing Order, Raising Concerns About Selective Transparency in the Legal System.
Final Judgment Amount: As Appellant did not press the issue before the district court, the claims have been forfeited. 5th Circuit.
Counsel does not separate the Garnishment Petition from Exhibits and Affidavit as Court demands. Are the basic rules exempt for Violators?
A 3-Panel consisting of familiar Judges Charles Wilson, Kevin Newsom and R Lanier Anderson defies logic and the law in this perverted...
Fix the Court’s letter is naive when addressing the judges on this panel. Roth clearly shows a lack of experience with the...
Both the lower court District Judge Sean Jordan of E.D. Tex. and the Fifth Circuit 3-panel blame the homeowner for the home...
If an amicus brief turns out to be unhelpful, the merits panel, after studying the case, will then simply disregard the amicus...
Although the 2006 lien was invalid under the Texas Constitution, Wells Fargo preserved its lien rights through equitable subrogation.
There is NO AFFIDAVIT on the docket at the N.D. Tex. district court which qualifies as PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE of service in...
The Panel does not mention the fact that Judges HIgginbotham and Stewart were on the panel for the 2017 appeal against Wells...
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
At the time of this article in 2021 the house is worth appx. $500k. The monetary 'sanctions' applied equal around a third...
Texas Second Court of Appeals has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in the...
Judge Randy Crane accepted Deutsche Bank’s secondary theory—that Ms. Castrellon’s separate suit tolled the statute of limitations.
No [wo]man in this country is so high that [s]he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that...
Personal Vendettas: All pro se foreclosure cases end up on their desks sequentially and they are generally dismissed without due process.
This court unlawfully denied the Burkes access to court documents. Both sets of counsel conspired with the Court and committed perjury, repeatedly.
This court unlawfully denied the Burkes access to court documents. Both sets of counsel conspired with the Court and committed perjury, repeatedly.