There needs to be an expedited solution to the ongoing Ochlocracy in the Judicial Branch and the revolving door policy in Congress.
They are gamblin' on the fact if they pad another $120k in fees, that allows judge to lodestar "reduce" to full original...
False: “The Judiciary’s power to manage its internal affairs,” Roberts stressed, “insulates courts from inappropriate political influence."
It is a cruel irony that those who have lost the most to the foreclosure crisis seem to be helped the least...
Nobody kidnapped these members of Congress when they were private citizens, dragged them to Washington and forced them to be in Congress.
New Jersey is trying to make it easier for family members or low-income buyers to purchase foreclosed homes.
The significant and distressing difference is the Burkes battle is not just with the opposing parties, but with the judicial machinery itself.
The end of Clerkships: If this proposal were to gain momentum, the lower courts should be mandated to implement this new precedent.
Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., were born after Leahy entered the Senate.
Why? Because it's big money. There is no mention of Albright calling a foreclosure mill to ask them to submit an affidavit...
Because Grant's pro se request for electronic filing has not been granted, she's given up. Federal courts continue to abuse their powers.
After LIT exposed the failure of corrupt federal judges to disclose their financial conflicts and recuse from cases, WSJ took up the...
The Court finds that it should award Plaintiffs $1,000.00 in statutory damages, $9,000 in punitive damages, attorney fees and expenses.
Engagement of Attorneys allowed Plaintiffs to submit a feasible plan, disburse a total of $105, 877.52 to creditors and receive a discharge.
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the call
Albright Slap Down: "Austin remains the more convenient forum...the district court’s decision amounts to a clear abuse of discretion.
LIT remains unconvinced a sitting appellate Chief Judge's opinion would have been reversed so willingly by Texas Supreme Court.
As of late June 2021, Judge Alsup had significantly fewer cases on his docket (157 cases) than did Judge Albright (1053 cases).