The Texas Struggle: Defying Northern Banking Giants and Their Bounty Hunting Lawyers to Protect Her Home from Rustlers and Thieves
In Plaintiff’s prior response, under section F. Burke Fails to Assert a Claim for Fraud, the How element was inadvertently omitted.
Texas Supreme Court Justice Blacklock: Why should the court give the lender rights it didn’t bargain for to get paid?
Gunsmoke and Legal Misfires: PHH’s Reply Misses the Mark. Hopkins Law’s Cockamamie Response Turns Legal Logic into High Noon Nonsense.
Three lauded Texas University law schools employ these academics. Despite their resumes centered on civil rights, they refuse to defend them.
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division's Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism.
A true and accurate copy of the legal filings presented by Plaintiff has not been uploaded to the docket prior to release...
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division's Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism from...
The “Jones Romance Scandal” exemplifies a broader issue in the courthouse, revealing attempts to maintain invented jurisdiction in this case.
If the law and Const. is applied correctly by an impartial judiciary who follow the rule of law it should have no...
Burke v PHH Ocwen, Hopkins Law, PLLC, Mark Hopkins and Shelley Hopkins before Bent Judge Al Bennett, SDTX, Houston.
This is the Pro Se's ninth lawsuit involving the foreclosure of the Property and third lawsuit against the Attorney Defendant Barrett Daffin.
Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal denied label of 'Vexatious Litigant' with at least 9 foreclosure filings spanning 18 years, including 6 since 2017.