Debt Collector

Robert Kline Represented by Lone Star Legal Aid Settles Lawsuit Quickly After Removal and Pre-Motion

A declaratory judgment concerning an alleged 25% ownership interest in real property located at 9223 Benning Drive, Houston, Texas 77031

Kline v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB

(4:23-cv-01474)

District Court, S.D. Texas, Judge George Hanks

APR 20, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 30, 2023
MAY 30, 2023

The case was before Judge Dedra Davis in Harris County District Court before removal.

STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Robert Kline, filed.

(Everitt, Leesa) (Entered: 05/30/2023)

MOTION for Request for Pre-Motion Conference

by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/18/2023.

(Rammell Crisp, McKenna) (Entered: 04/27/2023)

April 27, 2023

Judge George C. Hanks, Jr.
Honorable United States District Court Judge
Southern District of Texas
Houston Division United States Courthouse
515 Rusk Street
Room 6202
Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Robert Kline v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (not in its individual capacity) but solely as owner trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5, Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-01474

Pursuant to Court Procedures 6B, Defendant Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, (Not In its Individual Capacity) But Solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5 (“Wilmington”), requests a pre-motion conference for its anticipated 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Original Petition, ECF No. 1-3. Plaintiff raises claims for trespass to try title, quiet title, and a request for declaratory judgment concerning an alleged 25% ownership interest in real property located at 9223 Benning Drive, Houston, Texas 77031 (the “Property”). Defendant’s counsel conferred with counsel for Plaintiff via phone on April 27, 2023. Plaintiff’s counsel indicated they are opposed to the relief requested by Defendant.

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS IN THE PETITION

Plaintiff alleges the following causes of action in his Petition: (1) Trespass to try title, (2) Suit to quiet title, and (3) Declaratory Judgment. See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶¶ 21-27. Plaintiff’s factual allegations are:

(1) His mother, Mae Johnston, died intestate October 24, 1998, leaving Plaintiff and his sister, Sara Kline Schwartz as heirs of her estate, including an interest in the Property;

(2) Plaintiff has cerebral palsy;

(3) On October 27, 1999, Plaintiff and his sister conveyed their interest in the Property by cash warranty deed to Edward Johnston, Plaintiff’s stepfather;

(4) Edward Johnston encumbered the Property with a reverse mortgage dated March 28, 2005, defaulted, and the Property was sold at foreclosure on January 4, 2022;

and

(5) Wilmington, the buyer, filed an eviction suit against Edward Johnston and all occupants that Plaintiff, an occupant, appealed to the Harris County Civil Court at Law Number 1. See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶¶ 9-20.

BASIS FOR THE MOTION

Plaintiff fails to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face because he had capacity to execute a cash warranty deed in 1999, conveying his interest in the Property to his stepfather, Edward L. Johnston (now deceased) prior to foreclosure sale in January 2022.

See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶¶ 6-13.

Plaintiff’s sole factual basis for his claims against Wilmington rests on the allegation that “he did not execute the cash warranty deed and if he did he had no intent to convey his 25% interest in the subject property to his stepfather, Edward Johnston.”

ECF No. 1-3, at ¶ 12.

Plaintiff fails to provide any reason why he did not execute the cash warranty deed.

Instead, he provides a possible explanation for why he may not have intended to execute the cash warranty deed: Plaintiff claims he has cerebral palsy, and “[i]it is unclear as to Plaintiff’s mental capabilities to conduct business.”

ECF No. 1-3, at ¶ 10.

Plaintiff’s claim should have been raised against his stepfather, or Marilyn Gordon, the owner of the Property following Edward Johnston’s passing in 2020. See Quit Claim Deed, as recorded in Harris County, Texas RP-2020-67842.

Whatever interest Edward Johnston had he conveyed to Marilyn Gordon on December 4, 2019 through a quit claim deed.

See id.

Thus, because Edward Johnston or Marilyn Gordon allegedly received defective title from Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s claims should have been raised against them— not Wilmington.

Regardless, Plaintiff’s quiet title claim and his declaratory judgment claim that the cash warranty deed is voidable are barred by the statute of limitations.

To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the plaintiff must plead “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

“A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).

1.                   Plaintiff Fails to Plead Plausible Claims for Relief.

To the extent Plaintiff is claiming the deed is void due to a forgery or some other kind of defect that would render the deed void and survive a limitations defense, Plaintiff fails to allege any facts to support such a claim.

See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶¶ 16-20

(referencing an underlying eviction suit in which Plaintiff alleges the cash warranty deed is void due to a forgery);

see also Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity but solely as owner trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage Trust HB5 v. Edward Johnston and All Occupants of 9223 Benning Drive Houston, Texas 77031, Case No. 1187896

(Harris Co. Ct. at Law No. 1 July 08, 2022).

“Threadbare recitals of elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Ashcroft, 556 U.S. at 678. Plaintiff’s claims fail the plausibility standard, and should be dismissed for failure to state a claim.

Further, with regard to Plaintiff’s quiet title claim, Plaintiff failed to allege his claim against the party whose interest was adverse to his prior to the foreclosure sale: Edward Johnston.

His claims against Wilmington should be dismissed because Wilmington was not a party to the allegedly void or voidable deed.

See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶ 11.

And, any interest Edward Johnston or Marilyn Gordon had prior to the foreclosure was extinguished by the sale.

See Legall-Johnston v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Civil Action No. H-22-1560, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125457, at *5 (S.D. Tex. July 15, 2022).

Thus, Plaintiff fails to state a claim that is plausible on its face.

Finally, Plaintiff failed to allege tender of the amount due on the mortgage loan in his Petition. In Texas, this is a necessary pleading requirement, and failure to do so renders dismissal appropriate.

See, e.g., Campo v. Bank of Am., N.A., Civil Action No. H-15-1091, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, at *14 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2016), aff’d 678 F. App’x 227 (5th Cir. 2017).

Thus, Plaintiff’s claim for quiet title should be dismissed.

2.                   Plaintiff’s Claims are Barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Plaintiff’s quiet title claim and related declaratory judgment claim that the cash warranty deed is voidable are barred by the statute of limitations.

See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶¶ 23-27.

When a plaintiff claims a deed is voidable, as opposed to void, the statute of limitations is four years.

See Ford v. Exxon Mobil Chem. Co., 235 S.W.3d 615, 618 (Tex. 2007).

Further, a declaratory judgment claim is not a standalone cause of action; thus because Plaintiff’s quiet title claim fails, his related declaratory judgment claim also fails.

See, e.g., Eason v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-2990, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226943, at*13 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2020).

The cash warranty deed at issue in Plaintiff’s Original Petition was executed in 1999, over twenty (20) years ago.

See ECF No. 1-3, at ¶ 11.

Therefore, Plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim that the deed is voidable and substantive quiet title claim should be dismissed.

Defendant Wilmington respectfully requests that this Court permit a pre-motion conference, or allow Defendant to file a Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim without a conference.

Respectfully,

Dykema Gossett PLLC
McKenna R. Crisp

 

Adam Nunnallee
State Bar No. 2405743
SD 1287826
anunnallee@dykema.com
Comerica Bank Tower
1717 Main Street, Suite 4200
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: (214) 462-6453
Facsimile: (855) 256-1482

-and-

McKenna R. Crisp
State Bar No. 24115255
SD 3768723
mcrisp@dykema.com
Weston Centre
112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 1800
San Antonio, Texas 75205
Telephone: (210) 554-5500
Facsimile: (866) 894-9793

In Texas, a cash warranty deed refers to a type of deed used in real estate transactions to transfer ownership of property from a seller (grantor) to a buyer (grantee). The term “cash” in this context does not necessarily mean that the transaction involves physical cash; rather, it indicates that the buyer is purchasing the property for full monetary consideration, typically in the form of cash or a cash equivalent, as opposed to other forms of consideration like financing or trade.

A warranty deed provides certain assurances and guarantees to the buyer regarding the property’s ownership and condition. By using a cash warranty deed, the seller (grantor) warrants that they are the lawful owner of the property and have the right to sell it. Furthermore, the seller guarantees that there are no undisclosed encumbrances or defects on the property title that would hinder the buyer’s ownership rights.

In addition to these guarantees, a cash warranty deed typically includes a covenant that the seller will defend the buyer against any future claims or disputes regarding the property’s title. This means that if any unforeseen issues arise later, the seller is responsible for resolving them and ensuring that the buyer’s ownership rights are protected.

It’s important to note that the specific language and requirements for cash warranty deeds may vary depending on the jurisdiction and individual circumstances. Therefore, it is always advisable to consult with a qualified real estate attorney or a licensed title company in Texas to ensure that the deed is prepared correctly and meets all legal requirements.

  • ChatGPT

U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:23-cv-01474

Kline v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Assigned to: Judge George C Hanks, Jr

Case in other court:  270th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas, 22-55490

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Date Filed: 04/20/2023
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 240 Torts to Land
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Plaintiff
Robert Kline represented by Reginald Jerome Fox
Loan Star Legal Aid
1415 Fannin
3rd Floor
Houston, TX 77002
713-982-1993
Fax: 713-652-3814
Email: rfox@lonestarlegal.org
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDRichard Tomlinson
Lone Star Legal
1415 Fannin
Houston, TX 77002
713-652-0077
Email: rtomlinson@lonestarlegal.org
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5 represented by McKenna Brianne Rammell Crisp
Dykema Gossett, PLLC
1717 Main St.
Ste 4200
Dallas, TX 75201
214-462-6439
Email: mcrisp@dykema.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDAdam Ross Nunnallee
Dykema Gossett PLLC
1717 Main Street
Suite 4200
Dallas, TX 75201
(214) 462-6453
Fax: (214) 462-6401
Email: ANunnallee@dykema.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
04/20/2023 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 270th Judicial District, case number 2022-55490 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29786364) filed by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Index, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit A-1, # 4 Exhibit A-2, # 5 Exhibit A-3, # 6 Exhibit A-4, # 7 Exhibit A-5, # 8 Exhibit A-6, # 9 Exhibit A-7, # 10 Exhibit A-8, # 11 Exhibit A-9, # 12 Exhibit A-10, # 13 Exhibit B, # 14 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 04/20/2023)
04/21/2023 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mckenna R. Crisp on behalf of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5, filed. (Rammell Crisp, McKenna) (Entered: 04/21/2023)
04/21/2023 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/16/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4) (Entered: 04/21/2023)
04/27/2023 4 MOTION for Request for Pre-Motion Conference by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/18/2023. (Rammell Crisp, McKenna) (Entered: 04/27/2023)
05/02/2023 5 Response Letter by Robert Kline, filed.(Tomlinson, Richard) (Entered: 05/02/2023)
05/05/2023 6 ORDER re: 4 MOTION for Request for Pre-Motion Conference. The Court concludes that a pre-motion conference is not necessary at this time. Plaintiff Robert Kline may file an amended complaint on or before May 26, 2023. Wilmington may file a motion to dismiss within 14 days of the date on which Kline files his amended complaint. If Kline does not amend his complaint before the May 26 deadline, then Wilmington may file its motion to dismiss on or before June 9, 2023. Response and reply deadlines will fall according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules for the Southern District of Texas. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) (Entered: 05/05/2023)
05/05/2023 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee for Cascade Funding Mortgage HB5 identifying WSFS Financial Corporation as Corporate Parent, filed.(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/05/2023)
05/23/2023 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Robert Kline. The Parties anticipate filing the stipulated dismissal on or after June 9, 2023, filed. (bthomas, 4) (Entered: 05/24/2023)
05/30/2023 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Robert Kline, filed.(Everitt, Leesa) (Entered: 05/30/2023)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
05/30/2023 12:46:10

Witness the Financial Armageddon for DHI, Brandon Mendenhall and Associates: Part IV

LIT’s investigation reveals that Brandon Dutch Mendenhall and DHI Holdings LP are facing mounting financial obstacles.

Witness the Financial Armageddon for DHI, Brandon Mendenhall and Associates: Part III

LIT’s investigation reveals that Brandon Dutch Mendenhall and DHI Holdings LP are facing mounting financial obstacles.

Witness the Financial Armageddon for DHI, Brandon Mendenhall and Associates: Part II

LIT’s investigation reveals that Brandon Dutch Mendenhall and DHI Holdings LP are facing mounting financial obstacles.

Robert Kline Represented by Lone Star Legal Aid Settles Lawsuit Quickly After Removal and Pre-Motion
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top