202238620A
FENIX CAPITAL FUNDING LLC vs. WELLS FARGO BANK N A
(Court 281, JUDGE CHRISTINE WEEMS)
JUL 27, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUL 27, 2022
Return-Writ of Garnishment after Judgment (Service completed in violation of court procedures and in law)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Original Answer To Writ Of Garnishment And Request For Award Of Costs
Frozen since filing.
In another Regent garnishment case, it has been proposed to dismiss the case without prejudice:
This is way past non-suiting without prejudice. Regent has flaunted consumer protection laws for years, after originally holding a surety bond, and then operating for years without. It requires further action, inc. state judges and the execs in TX Gov.https://t.co/I9Lv8HJzM3
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) August 24, 2022
Judge Weems is getting way too many garnishment cases involving Regent and Associates. It’s disturbing.
Fenix Capital Funding shares the same address as Regent and Associates as does Knightbridge Funding, et al, in any filings submitted by Anh Regent.
Yet most of these funding entities have active websites and are in the main, located in New York. We don’t need to tell you what that all means, right?