CLERKGATE III
NOV 21, 2024
Despite two USPS Express Mail Packages being sent to the same court address, and both delivered with signature receipts recorded, only the later of the two deliveries has made it onto the court docket.
USPS Express Contents Delivered Nov. 21, 2024:
The November 20, 2024 combined filing.
USPS Express Contents Delivered Nov. 14, signed for Nov. 15, 2024:
The November 13, 2024 combined filing.
and
The November 11, 2024 combined filingg.
Hello Joanna Burke,
Your item was picked up at postal facility at
9:47 am on November 21, 2024 in HOUSTON, TX 77208.
The item was signed for by B LACEY.
Tracking Number: 9481730109355000162426
Package Shipped from: HQ – ECNS
Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Postal Facility
Hello Joanna Burke,
Your item was picked up at postal facility at
9:06 am on November 15, 2024 in HOUSTON, TX 77208.
The item was signed for by H LERMA.
Tracking Number: 9481730109355000137813
Package Shipped from: HQ – ECNS
Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Postal Facility
| DOCSENT,MAG |
U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:24-cv-00897
| Burke v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al Assigned to: Judge Charles Eskridge Referred to: Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Date Filed: 03/12/2024 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure Jurisdiction: Diversity |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 03/12/2024 | 1 | NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 11th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2023-86973 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31316463) filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 03/12/2024) |
| 03/13/2024 | 2 | ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/12/2024 at 02:30 PM in Room 11521 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(DanielBerger, 4) (Entered: 03/13/2024) |
| 03/13/2024 | 3 | NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (DanielBerger, 4) (Entered: 03/13/2024) |
| 03/14/2024 | 4 | NOTICE of Appearance by Shelley L. Hopkins on behalf of PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 03/14/2024) |
| 03/19/2024 | 5 | Emergency MOTION to Remand integrating memorandum and brief in support by Joanna Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/9/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (AaronJackson, 4) (Entered: 03/19/2024) |
| 03/27/2024 | 6 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by PHH Mortgage Corporation identifying Ocwen Financial Corporation as Corporate Parent, filed. (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 03/27/2024) |
| 03/29/2024 | 7 |
Opposed MOTION for Clarification by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/19/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 03/29/2024) |
| 04/05/2024 | 8 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 5 MOTION to Remand, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 04/05/2024) |
| 04/10/2024 | 9 | REPLY to Response to 5 MOTION to Remand, filed by Joanna Burke. (dah4) (Entered: 04/10/2024) |
| 04/10/2024 | 10 | RESPONSE to 7 Opposed MOTION for Clarification filed by Joanna Burke. (dah4) (Entered: 04/10/2024) |
| 04/12/2024 | 11 | MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/3/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 04/12/2024) |
| 05/15/2024 | 12 | NOTICE of Non-Response by Plaintiff re: 11 MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 05/15/2024) |
| 05/16/2024 | 13 | MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to PHH Mortgage Corporation’s motion to declare plaintiff Joanna Burke as a vexatious litigant by Joanna Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/6/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (acj4) (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
| 05/16/2024 | 14 | MOTION to Strike PHH Mortgage Corporation’s 11 MOTION Declare Plaintiff Joanna Burke as a Vexatious Litigant by Joanna Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/6/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (acj4) (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
| 06/05/2024 | 15 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 14 MOTION to Strike 11 MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant, 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to respnd to PHH Mortgage Corporation’s moton to declare plaintiff Joanna Burke as a vexatious litigant, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 06/05/2024) |
| 06/12/2024 | 16 | Opposed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial & Scheduling Conference by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/3/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 06/12/2024) |
| 06/13/2024 | 17 |
REPLY to 11 MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant, 14 MOTION to Strike 11 MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant, and motion for extension of time, filed by Joanna Burke. (acj4) (Entered: 06/14/2024) |
| 06/17/2024 | 18 |
ORDER Denying 5 Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion to Remand (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (dm4) (Entered: 06/17/2024) |
| 06/17/2024 | 19 |
ORDER denying 11 PHH Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant but WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling following a motion for dispositive relief; Denying as moot 13 Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond; Denying as moot 14 Motion to Strike.(Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (dm4) (Entered: 06/17/2024) |
| 06/17/2024 | 20 |
ORDER denying as moot 7 Defendant’s Motion to Clarify, or in the Alternative, Motion for an Extension of Time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Quiet Title; Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Quiet Title (Document No. 1-4 at CM/ECF page 565 of 588) is Denied. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (dm4) (Entered: 06/17/2024) |
| 06/17/2024 | 21 |
ORDER to Show Cause; within ten (10) days after the entry of this Order, the Plaintiff shall file a response to show cause, if any exists, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice; Order to (Show Cause Response due by 6/27/2024); ORDER Denying as Moot 16 Defendant’s MOTION to Continue Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference; Ordered that the Scheduling Conference set for July 12, 2024 at 2:30 p.m. is hereby CANCELED. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (dm4) (Entered: 06/17/2024) |
| 06/27/2024 | 22 | Verified REPLY to 10 Day Show Cause 21 Order, motion for extension of time & motion to abate filed by Joanna Burke. (acj4) (Entered: 06/27/2024) |
| 07/10/2024 | 23 | ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL. ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, AVT Title Services, LLC, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, PC, Judge Tami Craft aka Judge Tamika Craft-Demming, Judge Elaine Palmer, Sashagaye Prince, Mark D. Hopkins, Shelley L. Hopkins, and Hopkins Law, PLLC are DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with Rule 4(m) and for want of prosecution. The Court further observes that Plaintiff has requested a thirty-day extension to brief why the Court’s orders in this case are void and to abate any briefing and responses by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. There are no pending motions in this case, and thus, there are no outstanding briefing deadlines. Plaintiff’s request for extension and to abate responses is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (mf4) (Entered: 07/10/2024) |
| 07/11/2024 | 24 | RECUSAL ORDER. Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr recused. Deadlines in scheduling orders subsist. Court settings are vacated. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (mf4) (Entered: 07/11/2024) |
| 07/11/2024 | 25 | NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Charles Eskridge. Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (mf4) (Entered: 07/11/2024) |
| 07/23/2024 | 26 | ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4) (Entered: 07/23/2024) |
| 08/05/2024 | 27 | MOTION for Summary Judgment Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/26/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 08/05/2024) |
| 08/05/2024 | 28 | MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious LitigantMotions referred to Christina A Bryan. by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/26/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 08/05/2024) |
| 08/27/2024 | 29 | MOTION for Extension of Time Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Joanna Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/17/2024. (bmn4) (Entered: 08/29/2024) |
| 09/03/2024 | 30 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 29 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 09/03/2024) |
| 09/18/2024 | 31 | ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Extension of Time; It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Responses to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 27) and Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant (ECF 28) are due on or before October 7, 2024. Replies will be due 14 days after Responses are filed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan) Parties notified. (mem4) (Entered: 09/18/2024) |
| 09/25/2024 | 32 | REPLY to Response to 29 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Joanna Burke. (dah4) (Entered: 09/25/2024) |
| 10/07/2024 | 33 | MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Joanna Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/28/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Supplement Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit) (abb4) (Entered: 10/07/2024) |
| 10/07/2024 | 34 | RESPONSE to 28 MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant, filed by Joanna Burke. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Supplement Cover Sheet) (abb4) (Entered: 10/07/2024) |
| 10/07/2024 | 35 | RESPONSE to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Joanna Burke. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Supplement Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit) (abb4) (Entered: 10/07/2024) |
| 10/15/2024 | 36 | MOTION for Extension of Time Replies to ResponsesMotions referred to Christina A Bryan. by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/5/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 10/15/2024) |
| 10/16/2024 | 37 | ORDER granting : 36 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Replies. It is further ORDERED that PHH may file its Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to PHH’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 34 ) and its Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Second Motion to Declare Plaintiff Joanna Burke as a Vexatious Litigant (ECF 35 ) on or before November 4, 2024. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan) Parties notified. (mem4) (Entered: 10/16/2024) |
| 10/18/2024 | 38 | MOTION for Extension of Time to File ResponseMotions referred to Christina A Bryan. by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/8/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 10/18/2024) |
| 10/23/2024 | 39 | ORDER granting 38 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. PHH may file its Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF 33 ) on or before November 11, 2024.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan) Parties notified. (mem4) (Entered: 10/23/2024) |
| 11/04/2024 | 40 | REPLY to Response to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 11/04/2024) |
| 11/04/2024 | 41 | REPLY to Response to 28 MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious Litigant, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 11/04/2024) |
| 11/10/2024 | 42 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 33 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 11/10/2024) |
| 11/21/2024 | 43 | PLAINTIFF’S REPLY to 42 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Joanna Burke. (cng4) (Entered: 11/21/2024) |
| 11/21/2024 | 44 | SURREPLY to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Joanna Burke. (cng4) (Entered: 11/21/2024) |
| PACER Service Center | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Receipt | |||
| 11/21/2024 19:16:45 |
| DOCSENT,MAG |
U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:24-cv-00897
| Burke v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al Assigned to: Judge Charles Eskridge Referred to: Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Date Filed: 03/12/2024 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure Jurisdiction: Diversity |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 11/10/2024 | 42 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 33 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 11/10/2024) |
| 11/21/2024 | 43 | PLAINTIFF’S REPLY to 42 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Joanna Burke. (cng4) (Entered: 11/21/2024) |
| 11/21/2024 | 44 | SURREPLY to 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Joanna Burke. (cng4) (Entered: 11/21/2024) |
| PACER Service Center | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Receipt | |||
| 11/21/2024 17:26:47 |
In Texas, forget business or litigation funding. Just cozy up to the Judiciary and rake in illicit, illegal gains for life. 💰 #JudicialCorruption #TexasJustice https://t.co/mijSNNSBct https://t.co/LYYz1cDlQL pic.twitter.com/m02b9KP4Mh
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) November 21, 2024
Two-Week Breather for Defendants Highlights Bias in Judicial Time Allocation and Defies Judge’s Own Strict Scheduling Order
OCT 16, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: OCT 17, 2024
This order further highlights concerns about judicial bias. The Defendants were permitted to request that the Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time be limited, and the court agreed to this request, implying that the Plaintiff’s actions were seen as attempts to “thwart” the foreclosure process.
In part;
“This case is the most recent of many cases that Plaintiff has filed over the past several years to thwart foreclosure proceedings on real property located in Fort Bend, County, Texas. [Incorrect County]”
“Plaintiff filed a Verified Motion for an Extension of Time seeking a 60-day extension of time to respond due to “ongoing and debilitating symptoms as a result of [Hurricane] Beryl”
“PHH is opposed to a 60-day extension of time due to Plaintiff’s extensive litigation history and pattern of delay but does not oppose a short extension of time.”
The court granted a 20-day extension, keeping in mind that the pro se litigant lacks access to electronic filing. In contrast, PHH and their counsel have been allotted 28 days to respond, despite their spurious assertions.
This is a prejudgment of the Plaintiff’s intentions, undermining these proceedings. By prioritizing the Defendants’ concerns and limiting the Plaintiff’s time to respond, the court is brazenly favoring one party over the other.
This not only raises questions about impartiality but also about the equitable treatment of all parties in the judicial process. The swift agreement to restrict the Plaintiff’s extension can only be interpreted that the court has already formed an opinion about the case, eroding all trust in the judicial system’s objectivity.
Continued Warfare from Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan
(S.D. Texas, Houston Div’n, Doc. 37, Oct. 16, 2024)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation’s (PHH’s) Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies.1 ECF 36. It is
ORDERED that PHH’s Motion (ECF 36) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that PHH may file its Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to PHH’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 34) and its Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Second Motion to Declare Plaintiff Joanna Burke as a Vexatious Litigant (ECF 35) on or before November 4, 2024.
Christina A. Bryan
United States Magistrate Judge
Signed on October 16, 2024, at Houston, Texas.
1 The District Judge referred this case to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), the Cost and Delay Reduction Plan under the Civil Justice Reform Act, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. ECF 26.
It ain’t Ten Years, its Unequivocally Four Years according to the 5th Circuit https://t.co/GoCVACB66y pic.twitter.com/FldZzZv78O
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) October 16, 2024
Once Again, PHH and BDF Hopkins: Deceptive Practices Revealed
OCT 15, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: OCT 17, 2024
PHH’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLIES
PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”) files this Motion for Extension of Time, requesting the Court permit a short extension of time for PHH to file replies to Joanna Burke’s (“Plaintiff”) Response to PHH’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 34], and Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Second Motion to Declare Plaintiff Joanna Burke as a Vexatious Litigant [Doc. 35].
In support thereof, PHH would respectfully show the Court as follows.
1. PHH filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on August 5, 2024. [Doc. 27]. On the same day, PHH also filed the Second Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant. [Doc. 28].
2. Plaintiff requested a lengthy extension to file her responses to the motions. Pursuant to the Court’s Order granting extension, Plaintiff filed her responses to the motions on October 7, 2024. [Docs. 34, 35].
3. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, PHH’s Replies are due October 21, 2024. [Doc. 31].
4. PHH respectfully requests an extension of time to file its Replies for fourteen (14) days to November 4, 2024. Due to multiple hearings, mediations and previously scheduled deadlines of Counsel for PHH between the filing of Plaintiff’s Responses and the deadline,
Counsel for PHH need additional time to review the Responses and prepare replies and objections (if necessary).
5. PHH makes this request in good faith and without intent to unduly delay these proceedings. This extension will not prejudice Plaintiff or represent substantial burden to the Court.
6. PHH assumes Pro Se Plaintiff is opposed to this request for extension of time, as no response was received to email attempt to confer.
For the foregoing reasons, PHH respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time, extending the deadline for filing its Replies for fourteen days, until November 4, 2024. PHH further requests and prays for such other relief, at law or in equity, to which it has shown itself to be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Shelley L. Hopkins
Shelley L. Hopkins
State Bar No. 00793975
Southern District ID No. 926469
Mark D. Hopkins
State Bar No. 00793975
Southern District ID No. 20322
HOPKINS LAW, PLLC
2802 Flintrock Trace, Suite B103
Austin, Texas 78738
(512) 600-4320
mark@hopkinslawtexas.com
shelley@hopkinslawtexas.com
Counsel for
PHH Mortgage Corporation
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
On October 15, 2024, I emailed Pro Se Plaintiff Joanna Burke to determine if she is opposed to this request for extension of time. As of filing this Motion, Plaintiff has not responded so this Motion is filed as Opposed.
LIT; Actual email from Defendants counsel to Plaintiff at 12.58pm on Oct. 15, 2024;
“We are filing request for extension of time to file replies until 11/4/2024.
I will assume you are opposed unless you respond otherwise.”
/s/ Shelley L. Hopkins
Shelley L. Hopkins
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the foregoing has been filed with the Court using the Court’s CM/ECF and served to all parties and counsel of record on this the 15th day of October 2024.
🔥’s Call to Action Against Ochlocracy in Texas Federal Courts
Texas Common Law has been in place for over 110 years.
The federal judiciary in Texas has willfully and maliciously rewritten the law to the detriment of homeowners and in favor of lenders and their legal counsel. pic.twitter.com/jnvyOmAcI9
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) October 13, 2024
MAR 12, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: SEP 19, 2024
SEP 19, 2024
Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.
General Order: 2024-08
In the Matter of Referral of Civil Cases and Motions to Magistrate Judges
The high-profile scandals in the media spotlight this year from the third branch of the federal judiciary is Texas is indicative of past and ongoing bad faith and biased behavior by both federal judges and officers of the court.
Judge Edith Jones re Judge Lynn Hughes a decade earlier: “However, a recording of the proceedings indicates that Judge Hughes was extremely solicitous toward them, suggested at the outset that they should retain counsel, and did not ridicule them or their claims in any way.” pic.twitter.com/Dyt2RT6RXy
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) October 10, 2024
Team Texas: The Judicial Anthem Blares Out as the Federalists Replace the Old Guard of Ochlocracy, still housed in Scandal-soaked Houston’s Rusk Street Federal Courthouse. pic.twitter.com/jud2ROuR6q
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) October 10, 2024
“You’ve Won the Battle; Don’t Lose the War”,
Lynn Liberato, Hittner, Haynes & Boone, LLP, former President of State Bar of Texas, and co-Author with Judge David Hittner on the “pocket-book” on Summary Judgment in Texas, was counsel in trial before Hittner worth $$$ in fees. pic.twitter.com/2VgRGx4A6N— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) October 10, 2024
| DOCSENT,MAG |
U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:24-cv-00897
| Burke v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al Assigned to: Judge Charles Eskridge Referred to: Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Date Filed: 03/12/2024 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure Jurisdiction: Diversity |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2024 | 26 | ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4) (Entered: 07/23/2024) |
| 08/05/2024 | 27 | MOTION for Summary Judgment Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/26/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 08/05/2024) |
| 08/05/2024 | 28 | MOTION Declare Plaintiff as a Vexatious LitigantMotions referred to Christina A Bryan. by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/26/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 08/05/2024) |
| 08/27/2024 | 29 | MOTION for Extension of Time Motions referred to Christina A Bryan. by Joanna Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/17/2024. (bmn4) (Entered: 08/29/2024) |
| 09/03/2024 | 30 | RESPONSE in Opposition to 29 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 09/03/2024) |
| 09/18/2024 | 31 | ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Extension of Time; It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Responses to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 27) and Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant (ECF 28) are due on or before October 7, 2024. Replies will be due 14 days after Responses are filed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan) Parties notified. (mem4) (Entered: 09/18/2024) |
| PACER Service Center | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Receipt | |||
| 09/18/2024 18:46:16 |
Stitched-Up Justice: Sarah Sewing’s Family Foreclosure Avoidance Scheme Points to Harris County Corruption
Despite orders of foreclosure in 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2019, 2022 and another suit in 2023, Sewing avoids foreclosure auctions continually.
Priority Mail: USPS Consistently Loses Time Sensitive Federal Court Filings for Weeks, Not Days
The excessive delays are when legal mailings are sent from Kingwood to the federal court mailing address in Houston, Texas from Joanna Burke.
Operation Elder Abuse: PHH Mortgage Corporation and Deutsche Bank Judge Shopping Continues
Forum Shopping aka Judge Shopping is a disease in Texas courts says Congress, demanding this form of case assignment be outlawed.
