Miriam Hittner Tondera
(16-11141)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia
SEP 20, 2016 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: AUG 7, 2023
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY AND WAIVER OF THIRTY DAY HEARING REQUIREMENT
George Hittner (“Movant”) in the above referenced case, files his Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay and Waiver of Thirty Day Hearing Requirement (the “Motion”) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) and shows the Court the following:
Summary of Facts and Relief Requested
Miriam Hittner Tondera (“Debtor”) is in the fourth year of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan that provides no distribution to her unsecured creditors.
Debtor has been involved in years of litigation in Texas state courts because she refuses to stop threatening and harassing her brother, George Hittner (“Movant” or “Hittner”) and other members of her family.
Debtor has threatened and harassed her father, a United States District Judge. Debtor has been reported to Texas Adult Protective Services (by Movant and four other individuals) for financial and emotional abuse of her mother, a world-renowned pediatric ophthalmologist.
This unfortunate family rift was set in motion in 2013 when the Debtor used trust funds (set aside for her children’s education) for her own personal expenses.
The Debtor and members of her family attempted to resolve their differences in 2016 when they entered into a settlement agreement which specifically prohibited the Debtor from harassing and disparaging Movant.
Unfortunately, the harassment by the Debtor never fully subsided, and escalated to a point in 2020 that Movant was left with no option but to seek injunctive relief in a Texas State Court.
The Texas State Court has already granted a Temporary Restraining Order and an Agreed Temporary Injunction against the Debtor.
In response to the litigation, the Debtor has not only filed counterclaims against Movant, but has also amended her bankruptcy schedules and added Movant as an unsecured creditor.
These actions by Debtor are obvious attempts to use the automatic stay as a both a sword and a shield.
Movant and his family simply want to be left alone, and therefore seek an order from this Court modifying the Automatic Stay to allow the Texas litigation to resume so they may be able to pursue a Permanent Injunction and other relief as may be appropriate.
Jurisdiction and Venue
1. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the Debtor.
2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409.
3. The Movant waives any thirty-day requirement for a hearing as set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 362(e).
4. This contested matter arises out of and relates to the Debtor’s chapter 13 case filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division.
5. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).
Relevant Background Facts
6. Members of the Hittner family have been harassed and tormented by Debtor for the better part of the last seven (7) years. This is the latest unfortunate turn of a family rift that was set into motion in 2013 when Debtor converted funds that had been placed in her care for her son’s education to her own personal use.
Debtor has been unpersuaded to amend her behavior despite a temporary restraining order being signed against her, and has also failed to abide by two prior settlement/mediation agreements.
Debtor has harassed (or threatened to harass) not only members of the Hittner family, but also their representatives, friends, colleagues (and the like), both directly, to others, via electronic mail, and on social media on a regular and consistent basis.
7. Movant served as Trustee for two trusts that had been established for Debtor’s children, in which capacity Movant had served voluntarily and without remuneration from November 6, 2002 through June 7, 2016, when he resigned as Trustee.
8. In September 2013, Movant was informed by Debtor’s ex-husband that Debtor had represented to him that the trusts for his children were depleted, and that he needed to pay “his portion” of school tuition for their son’s private education.
Upon Debtor’s ex- husband’s inquiry to Movant (then serving as Trustee), Debtor’s ex-husband was informed that the trusts were, in fact, not depleted, and that Movant had already remitted a tuition payment to Debtor for their son’s tuition.
Upon further investigation, it was determined that Debtor had received the annual tuition check from Movant, paid half of her son’s tuition from those funds, and converted the other half of the funds remitted to her to herself.
Upon learning of these circumstances, Movant changed the policy of fund disbursements from the trusts such that payments would no longer flow through either Debtor or her ex-husband, but rather, would be issued directly to the ultimate payee (i.e., school, camp, etc.).
From the moment this policy change was made by Movant, Debtor has responded by relentlessly harassing, threatening, litigating, libeling and defaming Movant and members of his family.
9. In 2014, after nearly a year of relentless harassment and threats, Movant gave Debtor notice: if her behavior against him and his family did not cease, he would seek a restraining order against her.
Debtor refused to cease her behavior, and on August 13, 2014 the 127th District Court of Harris County signed a Temporary Restraining Order against Debtor. See attached Exhibit 1 – 2014 Temporary Restraining Order.
10. Following assurances from Debtor that her harassment would stop, Movant nonsuited the 2014 proceedings.
However, Debtor’s behavior did not cease, and for the next two years, Movant continued to endure Debtor’s harassing, threatening, libeling and defamatory behavior.
11. In January 2016, Debtor began requesting trust funds from Movant for the purchase of an automobile for her daughter.
Movant informed Debtor that her daughter’s Trust was being administered primarily for educational expenses, but that the trust would pay up to $9,000 towards the purchase of an automobile.
There was another option of full payment, to be paid in $250 monthly installments which Debtor rejected.
At every turn, Debtor threatened legal proceedings against Movant; and between January and June 2016, Debtor applied pressure for Movant to resign as Trustee.
Movant finally agreed to resign as trustee, in exchange for a full release and post-resignation protections.
On June 7, 2016, Movant, Debtor, the Grantor of the Trust, all alternate Trustees, and the subsequent acting-Trustee, all executed the Agreement.
The 2016 Resignation Agreements contained (amongst other provisions) a permanent renouncement of Debtor’s right to serve as trustee.
12. The 2016 Resignation Agreements sought to end the harassing course of conduct on the part of Debtor through contractual agreements and to immediately and forever cease “derogatory or disparaging statements” or “unwanted, harassing, and/or threatening contact” towards Movant and other released parties under the Agreements.
Despite this, Debtor has ignored the 2016 Resignation Agreements and continued her campaigns against Debtor and members of his family.
13. The 2016 Resignation Agreements contained a protection clause for Movant whereby Movant could request funds from the Trust(s) to cover his legal expenses if he were ever involuntarily drawn into a legal proceeding by Debtor related to Movant’s time as Trustee.
In September 2017, Movant received an inquiry from Debtor’s ex-husband inquiring as to the contact information for the acting-Trustee.
It was upon this inquiry that Movant learned that Debtor’s ex-husband was being taken back to court by Debtor because her ex-husband adjusted child support payments when their oldest child left for college.
14. Upon learning that Movant had provided the contact information of the acting-Trustee to Debtor’s ex-husband, Debtor, acting in a Pro Se capacity, issued a third-party subpoena/Request for Production of Documents pursuant to Official Code of Georgia Annotated (“OGCA”) §9-11-34(c) in the Superior Court of Dougherty County, Georgia, to Movant, seeking documents related to Movant’s nearly fourteen-year term as Trustee of the aforementioned Trusts.
Movant’s resignation as Trustee had been effective for more than a year, and he no longer had any interactions or management with the Trusts.
Moreover, the new acting-Trustee was in possession, custody or control of all the documents and records sought by Debtor.
Despite Debtor’s actual knowledge of these facts, Debtor issued a subpoena to Movant seeking every single document related to his time as Trustee; in addition to correspondence with Debtor’s ex-husband.
15. Upon receiving Debtor’s third-party subpoena/Request for Production of Documents, Movant responded and stated that all of the documents Debtor requested had been handed over to the acting-Trustee and that Debtor should obtain them from her.
Movant further warned that if Debtor did not withdraw her request that he would be forced to request legal funds from the Trust to respond to her request pursuant to the 2016 Resignation Agreement.
Debtor refused to withdraw her request.
Specifically, Debtor refused to seek the requested materials from the acting-Trustee who had been provided all of Movant’s original files during his service as Trustee.
Movant forwarded Debtor’s rejection to withdraw her request to the acting-Trustee, and requested she disburse $10,000.00 to Debtor’s attorney. The acting-Trustee, acting within her discretion, remitted the funds to Movant’s attorney.
The funds disbursed by the acting-Trustee were exclusively for the expense of responding to Debtor’s actions taken in violation of the Resignation Agreement, along with the expense of necessary litigation to enforce the provisions of the Resignation Agreement.
16. Thereafter, Counsel for Movant, opened a dialogue with Debtor in an effort to resolve the dispute in a timely manner and without further depletion of the Trust funds.
After many exchanges between Movant’s counsel and Debtor, Debtor voluntarily dismissed her Georgia action against her ex-husband with prejudice. However, Debtor refused to agree to end the harassing conduct and communications against Movant.
Debtor continued making threats of litigation against Movant and Movant’s counsel, requesting the “full $10,000” be returned to the Trust.
When informed that was not possible because a portion of those funds had already been used to defend Movant from Debtor’s request for production and in preparation for litigation to enforce the 2016 Resignation Agreement’s terms, the threats from Debtor increased along with the legal expenses.
17. Notably, despite repeated assurances that $10,000 (if not more) would be made available and applied toward Debtor’s daughter’s college tuition by Movant and members of his family, Debtor continued.
Put simply, neither Movant nor any other member of his family were willing to deposit funds into the Trust, especially since Trust funds that had been appropriately managed for 14 years had been recklessly depleted in one year; the same year that Debtor filed for bankruptcy protection.
The fact Debtor had purported to have established herself as Trustee, only exacerbated Movant’s inclination against depositing funds into the control of someone who has proven to be fiscally irresponsible; especially considering Debtor had previously converted trust funds from her son’s trust that had been designated for his education to her personal use.
18. In the second lawsuit (and counter-lawsuit) between Debtor and Movant, Debtor filed an action against Movant in Texas to attempt to recoup the funds that were remitted to Movant by the former Trustee of Debtor’s daughter’s trust.
Debtor’s husband represented her in this action until he was forced to withdraw by his law firm because they had not sanctioned his participation in the lawsuit on behalf of Debtor.
The parties ultimately mediated and resolved that lawsuit.
Although other members of the Hittner family were not signatories of the 2018 Mediation Agreement between Debtor and Movant, their father was a third-party beneficiary of that 2018 Mediation Agreement.
19. Specifically, Debtor agreed to forebear any communication (other than via the mediator who helped resolved the litigation) with her father, David Hittner, for a period of two years.
The 2018 Mediation Agreement contained a one-year extension “option period;” which David Hittner triggered on June 30, 2020.
Debtor has repeatedly breached the terms of the 2018 Mediation Agreement as it relates to Movant and his father. Indeed, Debtor has systematically failed to abide by any agreement she has entered into with Plaintiff.
20. In November of 2019, Debtor learned of an Irrevocable Trust (hereinafter, “Mintz-Hittner Trust”) that had been established by Helen Mintz-Hittner (mother of Debtor and Movant). Movant and his other sister, Susan Hittner, were designated as co-Trustees of the Mintz-Hittner Trust.
Subsequently, on December 23, 2019, without notice to, or permission from Dr. Mintz-Hittner, Debtor’s husband transmitted a letter on his employer’s letterhead to the Shenandoah Life Insurance Company.
In the letter, Debtor’s husband states: “Please be advised that this firm represents the Primary Beneficiary Miriam Hittner Minix and Contingent Beneficiary Joe Perkins Tondera in connection with the above referenced life insurance policy…”
Debtor’s husband’s letter triggered internal alerts within the life insurance company, and its representative reached out to Dr. Mintz-Hittner (the owner of the policy) and Movant to express concern regarding this unusual communication.
21. Debtor’s husband utilized law firm letterhead without permission from either his law firm or Dr. Mintz-Hittner’s representatives in an attempt to improperly coerce the life insurance company for Debtor.
Simultaneously, Debtor and Debtor’s husband’s conduct reflects an effort to interfere with Dr. Mintz-Hittner’s estate plan without her consent or knowledge.
Texas State Court Proceedings
22. On August 14, 2020, as a result of the Debtor’s refusal to stop the harassment, Movant was left with no choice but to file a second lawsuit against the Debtor in State Court in Houston, Texas (the “Texas Litigation”). 1
23. In response to the Texas Lawsuit, the Debtor amended her Schedule F and added Hittner as an unsecured creditor, with an unsubstantiated claim in the amount of $10,000.00.
Bankruptcy Filing
24. Although Movant was added to the Debtor’s bankruptcy schedules in November 2020, the Debtor has been in a pending bankruptcy since September 20, 2016.
25. The Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan was confirmed on January 4, 2017, and the Debtor has less than one year to complete her Chapter 13 plan.
26. The Debtor’s plan does not provide for a distribution to her unsecured creditors.
Relief Requested
27. Movant prays for the entry of an order modifying the automatic stay to allow him to continue with the Texas Litigation so that they can obtain a permanent injunction against the Debtor to finally put an end to the harassment.
28. Although Movant does seek reimbursement of attorney’s fees, costs and interest in the Texas Litigation, he will contentedly agree to an order that prohibits any collection of those fees until after the Debtor’s bankruptcy case is either dismissed or Ms. Tondera receives her discharge.
1 “The Texas Litigation is currently under a temporary seal order. Out of an abundance of caution, the majority of supporting documents related to the proceeding have been excluded from this public filing, but can be produced to the Court in camera or submitted under seal.”
Legal Standard
29. Cause exists to grant the Movant’s motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1).
30. Courts look at numerous factors to determine if cause exists to grant a motion for stay relief including: 1) prejudice to the bankruptcy estate and the Debtor; 2) the hardship on the Movant denying stay relief versus the hardship on the Debtor granting stay relief; and 3) the Movant’s probability of success on the merits. In re Coachworks Holdings, Inc., 418 B.R. 490, 492 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2009).
31. First, there is little prejudice to the Debtor or the estate if the stay is modified.
The Debtor is in her final year of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan that provides no distribution to the unsecured creditors. Furthermore, Movant is not seeking turnover of any assets, is seeking primarily equitable relief against the Debtor, and the Texas Litigation will not interfere with the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan.
32. The second factor also weighs in Movant’s favor as the hardship on him is significant if the stay is not modified, as this prevents him from seeking injunctive relief from the Texas Court which will result in months of harassment from the Debtor.
The hardship on the Debtor will be very minimal if the automatic stay is modified as the Debtor can make any telephonic appearances in the Texas Litigation.
33. The final element requires the Court to determine Movant’s probability of success on the merits.
The Texas State Court has already granted a Temporary Restraining Order and an Agreed Temporary Injunction against the Debtor and it seems probable that a permanent injunction will also be granted. Furthermore, as discussed above, the Movant believes that he will also succeed on the merits of the breach of contract claim for the Debtor’s blatant violations of the 2016 Resignation Agreement and the 2018 Mediation Agreement.
34. Finally, the Movant also requests a waiver of the fourteen-day stay set forth in Fed.R.Bankr.P. 4001(a)(3).
This 17th day of November, 2020.
/s/ Robert M. Matson
Akin, Webster & Matson, P.C. Robert M. Matson
P.O. Box 1773 Attorney for Movant
Macon, GA 31202 State Bar No. 477102
(478) 742-1889
rmatson@akin-webster.com
The GA case.
Middle District of Georgia (Albany)
Bankruptcy Petition #: 16-11141-AEC
Assigned to: Bankruptcy Judge Austin E. Carter Chapter 7 Previous chapter 13 Original chapter 13 Voluntary No asset
Debtor disposition: Standard Discharge |
|
Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera 6000 River Rd. Apt. 1305 Columbus, GA 31904-4584 LEE-GA SSN / ITIN: xxx-xx-4707 |
represented by | F. Anthony Blakey Kelley, Lovett, and Blakey, PC 2539 Lafayette Plaza Drive P.O. Box 70879 Albany, GA 31708 229-888-9128 Fax : 229-888-0966 Email: jfreeman@kelleylovett.com |
Trustee Kristin Hurst Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee P.O. Box 1907 Columbus, GA 31902-1907 706-327-4151 TERMINATED: 09/30/2020 |
||
Trustee Jonathan W. DeLoach Office of The Chapter 13 Trustee P. O. Box 1907 Columbus, GA 31902 706-327-4151 TERMINATED: 09/03/2021 |
||
Trustee Courtney Marie Davis 1090-C Founders Boulevard Athens, GA 30606 706-548-7070 |
||
U.S. Trustee U.S. Trustee – MAC 440 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard Suite 302 Macon, GA 31201 478-752-3544 |
Filing Date | # | Docket Text | |
---|---|---|---|
09/20/2016 | 1 (56 pgs) |
Chapter 13 Voluntary Petition All schedules and statements have been filed. Fee Amount $310 filed by Miriam Hittner Tondera (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/20/2016 | 2 (1 pg) |
Certificate of Credit Counseling filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/20/2016 | 3 | Social Security Number (B121) filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/20/2016 | 4 (1 pg) |
Disclosure of Compensation of Attorney for Debtor filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/20/2016 | 5 (4 pgs) |
Employee Income Records or Affidavit of No Income filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/20/2016 | 6 (3 pgs) |
Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/20/2016 | 7 (3 pgs; 2 docs) |
Meeting of Creditors with 341(a) meeting to be held on 10/21/2016 at 12:30 PM at Albany 341a Meeting Room (Old Courthouse & Post Office). Confirmation hearing to be held on 12/06/2016 at 09:00 AM at Albany Courthouse. Proof of Claim due by 01/19/2017. Objection to Dischargeability of Certain Debts Due 12/20/2016. (Auto Docket, ) (Entered: 09/20/2016) | |
09/21/2016 | 8 (1 pg) |
Creditor Request for Notices filed by Creditor Recovery Management Systems Corporation (Singh, Ramesh) (Entered: 09/21/2016) | |
09/23/2016 | 9 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)7 Meeting (AutoAssign Chapter 13)). No. of Notices: 8. Notice Date 09/23/2016. (Admin.) (Entered: 09/24/2016) | |
09/23/2016 | 10 (2 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)7 Meeting (AutoAssign Chapter 13)). No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 09/23/2016. (Admin.) (Entered: 09/24/2016) | |
09/23/2016 | 11 (4 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)6 Chapter 13 Plan filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera). No. of Notices: 10. Notice Date 09/23/2016. (Admin.) (Entered: 09/24/2016) | |
10/17/2016 | 12 (1 pg) |
Financial Management Course Certificate filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 10/17/2016) | |
10/25/2016 | 13 | Meeting of Creditors Held (Hurst, Kristin) (Entered: 10/25/2016) | |
01/04/2017 | 14 (2 pgs) |
Order Confirming Chapter 13 Plan , Fees Awarded: $3000.00, Expenses Awarded: $.00 to F. Anthony Blakey; Awarded on 1/4/2017 . Signed on 1/4/2017 (Penix, S.) (Entered: 01/04/2017) | |
01/07/2017 | 15 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)14 Order Confirming Chapter 13 Plan). No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 01/07/2017. (Admin.) (Entered: 01/08/2017) | |
03/30/2018 | 16 (1 pg) |
Change of Address Notification for Miriam Hittner Tondera replacing 111 Laurel Drive, Albany, GA 31721 filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 03/30/2018) | |
03/05/2019 | 17 (1 pg) |
Change of address notification for Miriam Hittner Tondera 1578 US Hwy 19 South #2008, Leesburg, GA 31763 filed by Kristin Hurst (Hurst, Kristin) (Entered: 03/05/2019) | |
10/02/2020 | 18 (2 pgs) |
Joint Interim Statement for Transferred Case . Jonathan W. DeLoach, as successor Standing Trustee, is substituted for Kristin Hurst. (DeLoach, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/02/2020) | |
11/05/2020 | 19 (14 pgs) |
Amended Schedules E/F, adding creditors or codebtors, with certificate of service to additional creditors or codebtors Fee Amount $31 filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 11/05/2020) | |
11/17/2020 | 20 (16 pgs) |
Motion for Relief from Stay Fee Amount $181, filed by Creditor George Hittner Hearing scheduled for 01/06/2021 at 10:00 AM – Albany Courthouse. (Matson, Robert) (Entered: 11/17/2020) | |
01/04/2021 | 21 (2 pgs) |
Consent Order Granting Motion For Relief From Stay Filed by George Hittner (Related Doc # 20) Signed on 1/4/2021. (Hayes, T.) (Entered: 01/04/2021) | |
01/07/2021 | 22 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)21 Order on Motion For Relief From Stay). No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 01/07/2021. (Admin.) (Entered: 01/08/2021) | |
06/01/2021 | 23 (2 pgs) |
Notice of Appearance and Request for Notice by Robert M. Matson filed by Creditor Joe Harold Tondera (Matson, Robert) (Entered: 06/01/2021) | |
08/02/2021 | 24 | Chapter 13 Trustee Report that the debtor or debtors have completed all payments according to the confirmed chapter 13 plan including all modifications thereof and is eligible for a discharge, filed by Jonathan W. DeLoach (DeLoach, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/02/2021) | |
08/03/2021 | 25 (2 pgs) |
Notice to Debtor Regarding Requirement for Filing of Certification of Plan Completion and Request for Discharge. (ADI) (Entered: 08/03/2021) | |
08/05/2021 | 26 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)25 Notice to Debtor Regarding Requirement for Filing of Certification of Plan Completion & Request for Discharge). No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 08/05/2021. (Admin.) (Entered: 08/06/2021) | |
09/02/2021 | 27 (9 pgs) |
Notice of Voluntary Conversion to Chapter 7 Fee Amount $25 filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/02/2021) | |
09/02/2021 | 28 (13 pgs) |
Amended Schedules A/B, I and J, I hereby certify that I have not added creditors or codebtors, changed the amount as being owed to a creditor, changed the classification of a debt or deleted creditors or codebtors, filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/02/2021) | |
09/02/2021 | 29 (6 pgs) |
Amended Schedules C, I hereby certify that I have not added creditors or codebtors, changed the amount as being owed to a creditor, changed the classification of a debt or deleted creditors or codebtors, filed by Debtor Miriam Hittner Tondera (Blakey, F.) (Entered: 09/02/2021) | |
09/03/2021 | 30 (1 pg) |
Notice of Rejection of Appointment by Trustee Robert M. Matson. (Matson, Robert) (Entered: 09/03/2021) | |
09/03/2021 | 31 (1 pg) |
Notice of Rejection of Appointment by Trustee Joy R. Webster. (Webster, Joy) (Entered: 09/03/2021) | |
09/03/2021 | 32 (4 pgs; 2 docs) |
Converted Meeting of Creditors . 341(a) meeting to be held on 10/13/2021 at 11:00 AM at Trustee Davis Teleconference. Last day to oppose discharge or dischargeability is 12/13/2021. Financial Management Course due:12/13/2021, (Thomas, C.) (Entered: 09/03/2021) | |
09/05/2021 | 33 (6 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)32 Meeting of Creditors Chapter 7 No Asset). No. of Notices: 9. Notice Date 09/05/2021. (Admin.) (Entered: 09/06/2021) | |
09/05/2021 | 34 (2 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)32 Meeting of Creditors Chapter 7 No Asset). No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 09/05/2021. (Admin.) (Entered: 09/06/2021) | |
09/09/2021 | 35 (3 pgs) |
Chapter 13 Trustee’s Final Report and Account . Objections to Final Report due by 10/12/2021. (DeLoach, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/09/2021) | |
12/22/2021 | 36 (2 pgs) |
Order Discharging Debtor. Signed on 12/22/2021. (Bryan, M.) (Entered: 12/22/2021) | |
12/24/2021 | 37 (5 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing (related document(s)36 Order Discharging Debtor). No. of Notices: 6. Notice Date 12/24/2021. (Admin.) (Entered: 12/25/2021) | |
01/05/2022 | 38 | FINAL DECREE. The estate of the above-named debtor(s) has been fully administered. IT IS ORDERED THAT: the current and any former case or interim trustee is discharged as trustee of the above-named debtor and the bond is cancelled; the case of the above-named debtor(s) is closed. THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ORDER . Signed on 1/5/2022. (Bryan, M.) (Entered: 01/05/2022) |
PACER Service Center | |||
---|---|---|---|
Transaction Receipt | |||
08/07/2023 07:36:13 |
United States v. Williams, No. 15-12130 (11th Cir. Feb. 20, 2020)
Fifth Circus and the NGO in the Country formerly known as United States of America
New Global Order: Controlling Citizens and Blocking Access to Court Records and Content – Laws In Texas https://t.co/sen8DGSMuX@FBI @FBIHouston @USAO_SDTX @VolokhC @Public_Justice @TheFIREorg https://t.co/7v9AfV1MZS pic.twitter.com/el8wdgv78Y
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) August 6, 2023
HITTNER, GEORGE J v MINIX, MIRIAM HITTNER
Court 295, Judge Donna Roth
JUL 27, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUL 27, 2023
The Harris County Civil Action is unlawfully sealed by Court 295, Judge Donna Roth presiding.
Marilyn Vilandos’ discipline and focus are on full display when she gets a case. She loves evaluating each one to find the strategy that will achieve her client’s goals. Her dedication to justice and fairness drives her to get the best outcome for every client. And this dedication has shown over her career, as she has tried over 50 cases to trial or bench.
Marilyn’s approach is the same no matter the size and scope of a case. Large or small, her passion, effort and energy are equal. Every client receives the same attention. That means that not only do they get the benefit of her love of strategy and justice at equal levels, but also service, in that she prides herself on communicating and working closely with every client to achieve their goals and exceed their expectations.
Some attorneys find a respite from the rigors of their chosen career by relaxing with a book or getting away to a beach somewhere, but Marilyn finds herself taking that same discipline that drives her to success with her clients and refocusing it on her love of CrossFit. She trains daily and competes in CrossFit competitions regularly. The mental discipline to succeed in CrossFit helps her hone her mental discipline even further to succeed for her clients.
113 Roy St.
$412k loan on property worth $480k (85% LTV)
Billie Gemmell is a provider established in Houston, Texas and her medical specialization is Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered. The NPI number of this provider is 1902810278 and was assigned on July 2006. The practitioner’s primary taxonomy code is 367500000X with license number 021097 (TX). The provider is registered as an individual and her NPI record was last updated 16 years ago.
Justice Kagan claims judges are not “imperial” but LIT disagrees. We know the reason why court records are being sealed more than the law allows… to protect the judiciary from media investigations into their personal assets, property and family as a matter of public concern. pic.twitter.com/oczE9ZTTUd
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) August 7, 2023
Miriam
November 18, 2024 at 8:40 am
If Judge Roth sealed the case, how did you get a copy of the Final Judgment?