By
Posted on
APR 29, 2025 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 30, 2025
New adversary case:
Bookmark for updates.
Southern District of Texas (Houston)
Adversary Proceeding #: 25-03308
Assigned to: Bankruptcy Judge Jeffrey P Norman Lead BK Case: 22-30950 Lead BK Title: Jerry Edwards Lead BK Chapter: 13 Demand: $100000000 |
Date Filed: 04/24/25 |
Nature[s] of Suit: | 14 | Recovery of money/property – other | ||
72 | Injunctive relief – other |
Plaintiff ———————– Jerry Edwards 309 W Humble Street Baytown, TX 77520 SSN / ITIN: xxx-xx-4979 |
represented by |
Amy Beth Clark-Downing
|
V. | ||
Defendant ———————– NEWREZ LLC,d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing c/o Corporation Service Company, Registe 211 E. 7th Street Suite 620 Austin, TX 78701 |
represented by |
NEWREZ LLC,d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
|
Filing Date | # | Docket Text | |
---|---|---|---|
04/24/2025 | 1 (14 pgs) |
Adversary case 25-03308. Nature of Suit: (14 (Recovery of money/property – other)),(72 (Injunctive relief – other)) Complaint by Jerry Edwards against NEWREZ LLC,d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. Fee Amount $350 (Ciment, Daniel) (Entered: 04/24/2025) | |
04/24/2025 | 2 (2 pgs) |
Request for Issuance of Summons on Newrez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. (Ciment, Daniel) (Entered: 04/24/2025) | |
04/25/2025 | 3 (2 pgs) |
Preliminary Pretrial Order Signed on 4/25/2025 (Related document(s):1 Complaint) Pre-Trial Conference set for 6/24/2025 at 11:00 AM at Houston, Courtroom 403 (JPN). (trc4) (Entered: 04/25/2025) | |
04/25/2025 | 4 (2 pgs) |
Summons Issued on NEWREZ LLC,d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing Date Issued 4/25/2025. (rlm4) (Entered: 04/25/2025) | |
04/27/2025 | 5 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing. (Related document(s):3 Scheduling Order) No. of Notices: 2. Notice Date 04/27/2025. (Admin.) (Entered: 04/27/2025) |
PACER Service Center | |||
---|---|---|---|
Transaction Receipt | |||
04/29/2025 15:01:12 |
CashCall Returns To the Ninth Circuit and the Panel Discusses Equity versus Restitution, In Law – CashCall, Inc: They are to pay more than $134 million in legal restitution to which they object. The Ninth Circuit rejected their arguments. https://t.co/nDaWrTQOxS
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) April 25, 2025
APR 8, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 30, 2025
BK Case:
