Rojas v. Reverse Mortgage Funding, LLC
(4:22-cv-02279)
District Court, S.D. Texas
JUL 11, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: AUG 2, 2022
ERICK DELARUE SHOULD BE SANCTIONED
Taking on client when the lawsuit was frivolous
Abandoning client on removal
Asking why he didn’t perform due diligence as LIT highlighted earlier
Of Course, the Judiciary is protecting one of it’s own again.
Ochlocracy continues in SDTX courthouse in Rusk St.
MEMO AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Followed up by an unlawful Motion to Dismiss on Jul 22, by Mark Cronenwett for the Wolves of Texas.
Mark Cronenwett Rushes into SDTX With A Premature Motion to Dismiss 48 Hrs After Removal – Then This Happened – https://t.co/Y7cwI9xnNT
Hat tip to Judge Ricardo Hinojosa – He Outshines CA5, who refused to sanction the same behavior by Mark Hopkins. https://t.co/zh8wErEeg8 pic.twitter.com/KKDN5GACef
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) July 14, 2022
202239969
ROJAS, ANTOINETTE vs. REVERSE MORTGAGE FUNDING LLC
(Court 152, ROBERT K. SCHAFFER)
JUL 5, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUL 5, 2022
I am text block. Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/693f0/693f0b554da252ae157900fe99f6cc54773117ae" alt=""