Debt Collector

Debt Collectin’ Regarding a Breach of Lease by Kennard Law PC

Houston attorney Alfonso Kennard is being sued for non payment of his office space lease at Woodway in Harris County District Court.

202319907 –

DECORATIVE CENTER OF HOUSTON LP vs. KENNARD LAW P C

(Court 011, JUDGE KRISTEN BRAUCHLE HAWKINS)

MAR 28, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 24, 2023
May 24, JUN 16, AUG. 7, 2023 APR 11, 2024
AUG 9, 2024

No movment since filing. See below – severed, and mediation pending.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Mediation

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO KENNARD LAW P.C.’S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE (4/2/2024)

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Decorative Center of Houston, L.P. (DCOH) and files this RESPONSE TO KENNARD LAW P.C.’S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE and in support will show as follows:

Background

1.                  This case was initiated on 03/28/2023, concerning a landlord/tenant disagreement where Plaintiff/Landlord DCOH claims damages exceeding $450,000.00 due to an alleged breach by Defendant/Tenant Kennard Law (KENNARD).

2.                  KENNARD’s absence from its primary business location at 5120 Woodway Ste. 10010, Houston, Texas 77056, following a commercial lockout, led DCOH’s counsel to attempt service via KENNARD’s registered agent at 3746 Rocky Ledge Lane, as recorded with the Texas Secretary of State. However, this endeavor failed, with the process server informed by the current tenant that the address was incorrect [Exhibit 1].

3.                  Proceeding with caution, DCOH’s counsel sent the citation via certified mail to the same address. Regrettably, this attempt also proved unsuccessful [Exhibit 2].

4.                  Having exhausted efforts at the registered agent’s address, DCOH then pursued service at 2603 Augusta, Houston, Texas 77057, an address determined through diligent investigation. Nevertheless, this attempt also met with failure. [Exhibit 3]

5.                  Ultimately, after exploring all available avenues, DCOH’s counsel attempted service through the Secretary of State. [Exhibit 4]

6.                  Throughout this time, DCOH’s counsel also sent numerous email to KENNARD’s principal owner and representative who also happens to be an attorney.

6.                  It’s noteworthy that despite being locked out of the premises central to this litigation for over a year now, to this day KENNARD has persistently and knowingly used 5120 Woodway Ste. 10010, Houston, Texas 77056 as its address in court filings, both in this case and others.

7.                  A review of the Texas Bar’s attorney lookup also shows that Kennard’s principal owner and representative Alfonso Kennard is still using 5120 Woodway Ste. 10010, Houston, Texas 77056 as his firm’s address.

7.                    As evidenced above, any shortcomings in service stem from KENNARD’s lack of cooperation and attempts to evade service rather than any lack of diligence on DCOH’s part.

Argument and Authority

8.                  In Texas, a plaintiff can serve a defendant through the Secretary of State when the defendant’s registered agent cannot be found at its registered office with reasonable diligence. Acadian Props. Austin, LLC v. KJMonte Invs., LLC 650 S.W,.3d 98; AES Valves, LLC v. Kobi Int’l, Inc. 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 3207; MG Int’l Menswear, Inc. v. Robert Graham Designs LLC, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 1150.

9.                  Even when there is a defect in service of process, it does not defeat amenability to service of process and only serves to the provide the defendant with more time to answer. City of Houston

v. Bryant, 516 S.W.3d 47; Wright v. Sage Eng’g, Inc., 137 S.W.3d 238; Wuxi Taihu Tractor Co. v. York Group, Inc. 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12888.

9.                  In this instance, DCOH’s legal representation demonstrated exceptional diligence in attempting to serve KENNARD through its registered agent. However, KENNARD’s failure to provide an updated address in court filings and with the Texas State Bar obstructed these service efforts, which KENNARD now alleges were erroneous. Consequently, service was accomplished through the Texas Secretary of State.

10.              Given the evident dilatory intent behind KENNARD’s motion, Plaintiff DCOH respectfully urges this Court to reject the motion in its entirety. Alternatively, DCOH requests the Court to partially deny the motion and grant KENNARD additional time to submit its response.

Prayer

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff DCOH asks this Court to deny in whole, KENNARD’S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Ricardo Guerra
TBN: 24074331

Guerra Days Law Group
515 N. Sam Houston Pkwy E
Ste. 250 Houston, Texas 77060
Tel. 281-760-4295
Fax: 866-325-03421
service@guerradays.com

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE SIGNED

Kennard’s been locked out.

The process server cannot locate him (Jun 1)

 202403956 – CONSOLIDATED CASE

KENNARD LAW PC vs. DECORATIVE CENTER OF HOUSTON LP

 (Court 011)

Fifth Circuit Vacates The Fonz’s Sanctions for Procedural Failures by Judge Charles Eskridge

Rule 11’s safe harbor provisions require a party seeking sanctions to serve the motion on opposing party and then wait 21 days before filing.

Who is Texas Attorney Alfonso Kennard Jr and Why Are Citizens Incensed with the Fonz and the Texas Bar?

On Sunday, 13 December, 2020 LIT receives this contact inquiry form with attachments from “anonymous” but concerned citizen about Texas lawyer Alfonso Kennard Jr.

Debt Collectin’ Regarding a Breach of Lease by Kennard Law PC
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top