Here’s Why Judge Bennett is too biased to be Constitutionally tolerable in Mrs. Burke’s lawsuit.
FEB 3, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 5, 2023
It is notable that on Tuesday, 31 Jan., 2023 the vexatious litigant case Serafine v. Crump, No. 03-21-00053-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2023), which LIT reviewed as being completely void, corrupt and wordsmithed, see:-
Glossin’ Opinions: Texas Lawyer Mary Lou Serafine Still Labeled a Vexatious Litigant in 2023, Mary Lou Serafine is a lawyer in Austin who’s been actively contesting her vexatious litigant label by Texas Courts. She loses to Glossin’;
and also;
Vexatious Litigant Statute for Texas Declared Unconstitutional in this New Federal Lawsuit. Should Texas judges be able to revoke a person’s first amendment right to bring a lawsuit and revoke it permanently? So ask the complainants.
After release of this corrupt opinion, very quickly, on Friday, Feb. 3, 2023, Judge Bennett released the Order as detailed herein (a scanned copy so as to make it impossible to transcribe without doing so manually), in anticipation of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit appeal.
Reliance Insurance v. The Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 110 F.3d 253 (5th Cir. 1997)
BENNETT’S ONE CASE CITE, CITES TO RULE 16B, WHICH THE COURT DID NOT HOLD, INSTEAD RULING BEFORE “ANY” HEARING,
e.g., (B) after consulting with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference.
Turnage v. General Elec. Co., 953 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1992)
BENNETT’S ONE CASE CITE IN TURN RELIES ON ABOVE CASE, WHICH IS ABOUT A 2 YEAR DISCOVERY DELAY, NOT RELEVANT TO THIS CASE.