A clerk of a federal court performing routine duties such as entering and order and notifying parties does not enjoy an absolute...
Although the 2006 lien was invalid under the Texas Constitution, Wells Fargo preserved its lien rights through equitable subrogation.
Judge Higginson (9) leads, followed closely by Judges Stewart (8) Southwick (7) Smith, King, Jolly and Costa (6) on foreclosure appeal panels
One cannot allow one federal court in the State of Texas to allow pro se to file electronically and another deny all...
It's former King of the Courts, Union Chief Dennis Quirk versus Queen of Corruption and Conflicts from the Bench, Chief Judge Janet...
The “good cause” requisite to recall the mandate is the showing of need to avoid injustice.
Where fraud is found, the party that used fraud should be deprived of the benefit of the judgment and any inequitable advantage...
Lawyer Manookian has displayed a custom and habit of threatening opposing counsel and third parties for no reasonably legitimate purpose.
Aplin has given to 20 PACs, Patrick, Gov. Abbott, AG Ken Paxton, Speaker of the Texas House Dade Phelan, and former speaker...
ABOVE THE LAW: Private citizens who are brutalized by rogue federal officers (OF THE COURTS) can find little solace ... DUE TO...
Illinois: The “single-refiling rule,” which prohibits actions that have been voluntarily dismissed from being refiled more than once.
If you notice, all the arguments re acceleration are based on post 2008 financial crisis opinions by the corrupt Fifth Circuit judges.
Who is Texas tycoon and physician James Leininger and what's his relationship to the Judiciary and Fifth Ciruit Chief Judge Owen?
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
Justice Sotomayor rips Fifth Circuit for their breathtaking defiance of the rule of law, precedent, and their flaming cowardice.
Kim Naimoli v Ocwen Loan Servicing, now PHH Mortgage Corporation receives response from CFPB at request of Second Circuit Panel on Appeal.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.