Appellate Judges
-
922Indymac Bank’s Simon Heyrick: This is What Jail Looks Like for the Chief of Predatory Lending
You will note in the FDIC litigation involving Indymac Bank, Simon Heyrick is listed as Chief Credit Officer, Enterprise Risk Mgt Committee.
-
643Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 76a in Focus: Appellate Court’s Ruling Sets Precedent, Agrees with LIT
Read a summary of an appellate court opinion highlighting the reversal of a sealing order in a civil case due to procedural...
-
934Denied Rights? Homeowner Barred from Viewing Own PHH Loan File But US Gov Can Demand Direct Access
Federal law, the RFPA, authorizes US gov to obtain 300 PHH Mortgage loan files without notifying or obtaining the consent of any...
-
648Mega Financial Crisis Settlement for Investors But Zero Compensation for True Victims: The Homeowners
The 2008 Scandal: DOJ admits predatory lending was responsible but settlement provides no restitution for true victims: the homeowners.
-
728Ground Zero: All Federal Judges Disqualified from Minnesota Case Linked to Lawyer turned Judge
Shocking Twist in Legal Battle: All Judges Disqualified by Chief Judge of the Federal District of Minnesota Due to Black Robe Testimony.
-
586Before He’s Dumped by New Residential, Bandit Lawyer Mark D. Hopkins Challenges Default Judgment
Mark Hopkins is replaced by Valerie Henderson of Baker Donelson. Out with the bandit, along with his dirty money and connections. It's...
-
1.1KNew Global Order: Controlling Citizens and Blocking Access to Court Records and Content
Public Tensions Increase as the 5th Circuit Court Affirms Sealing Order, Raising Concerns About Selective Transparency in the Legal System.
-
759Shack’s Insomnia: Filing Baseless Lawsuits to Stop Foreclosure When It’s Ricardo “Kickbacks” Aguirre
Trustee Davila, Lopez, and Leticia Ablaza demanded that HISD cancel its contract with MetroClean, and award it to Accel Building Maintenance.
-
769The Shack Train is Pullin’ Into the 14th Court of Appeals Puffin’ Smoke for Indicted Tony Hutchison
Anthony Hutchison systematically over-billed HISD and inflated bills for service. Ray L Shackelford is a close friend, associate and lawyer.
-
1.2KResidential Mortgage Consultant Christopher Wyatt Defends HOA Foreclosure Action
Chris Wyatt's removed federal foreclosure with PHH Mortgage was continued when he filed a now dismissed bankruptcy. It's dismissed.
-
555LIT’s Last Supper Series: Is this Private Lawyer a Wingman for the U.S. Gov and Texas in Libel Lawsuit?
Bob’s private law practice focuses on debt collection, however this is intermingled as a trusted wingman for both Texas and the US...
-
526Attorney Barbara W. Palmer is Commanded to Appear at a Hearing and Provide Proof of Authority to Act
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether attorney has standing or legal authority to act as the...
-
590Center for Judicial Ethics for State Courts: Judicial Disqualification Based on Campaign Contributions
In 2014, ABA House of Delegates adopted a resolution urging states to adopt judicial disqualification and recusal procedures.
-
839Unfair Gotcha: We’re Snap Removin’ You to Federal Court, And We Ain’t Waivin’ Service Despite the Rules
Sandoval v. City of San Francisco, 22-cv-02409-RS (N.D. Cal) Dismissing McEachern at this point would be an unreasonable and unfair gotcha.
-
750Fifth Cir: Forget Precedent, Pressin’ for Final Judgment Amount is Homeowner’s Job, not Judge’s
Final Judgment Amount: As Appellant did not press the issue before the district court, the claims have been forfeited. 5th Circuit.
-
683A Fresh Sua Sponte Opinion from the Fifth Circuit Defies Past Opinions, At Least for Pro Se Litigants
CA5: A single instance of failing to strictly adhere to a court-set deadline is short of the severity of conduct our court...
-
810Judge Keith Ellison Slapped Down Conveniently by Gumbo5 for Dismissing Pro Se With Prejudice
Ain't the timing amazing. We've detailed on LIT how judges are injecting their own personal bias into opinions and applying wrong standards.
-
476First Class from the Fifth Circuit
Benjamin argues that precedent relied on by the district court does not adequately support difference between first class and certified mail.
