Appellate Judges

Fifth Circuit Judge Stuart “Kyle” Duncan’s Public Persona at Stanford Law School is He’s An Outlaw

It’s a great country where you can harshly criticize federal judges and nothing bad will happen to you said the 5th Circuit Appellate Judge.

Judge Kyle Duncan Speaks at Notre Dame about Free Speech, Legal Education

MAR 27, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAR 28, 2023

Judge Kyle Duncan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit visited Notre Dame on Friday, March 24 to deliver a lecture titled “Free Speech and Legal Education in Our Liberal Democracy.” The event was sponsored by the Center for Citizenship & Constitutional Government, the Notre Dame Federalist Society, and the Federalist Society’s Freedom of Thought Project.

Duncan’s talk at Notre Dame was focused on the American free speech tradition and the current state of legal education. Addressing the elephant in the room, Duncan spoke to his recent experience at Stanford Law School.

“It’s a great country where you can harshly criticize federal judges and nothing bad will happen to you,”

remarked Duncan.

He continued: “

But make no mistake — what went on in that classroom on March 9 had nothing to do with our proud American tradition of free speech … It was rather a parody of it.”

Duncan was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit by President Donald Trump in May 2018. Recently, he has become the center of considerable national attention after being heckled out of Stanford Law School by what can only be described as a “guerrilla” audience.

This audience was inflamed by Duncan’s opinion in the case United States v. Varner, which they claimed had “denied a transwoman’s existence.”

The protest escalated to the point that Duncan had to be escorted out by two U.S. Marshals.

“That a federal judge was not able to deliver prepared remarks at one of our nation’s highest-ranked law schools is troubling, ” said Vincent Phillip Muñoz, Director of the Center for Citizenship and Constitutional Government.

“There may be reasons to disagree with the judge on both legal and policy grounds,” Muñoz continued, “but one cannot receive a sound legal education – indeed, our legal system cannot function – without the freedom for individuals to advocate for their side.”

In his lecture at Notre Dame, Duncan explained the difference between free speech, which can be exercised through principled protests, and mob-like attempts at intimidation.

The latter is especially concerning to see at legal institutions, such as Stanford Law School, he said.

According to Duncan, the point of a legal education is to train students to think logically, to argue respectfully, and to advocate effectively on behalf of themselves and their clients.

Screaming insults and silencing the person you are claiming to debate does not utilize any of those skills.

After the debate, Duncan expounded on the state of legal education in America, commenting on the dangers of cancel culture.

“My advice to students facing such a poisonous culture, especially in a law school, is to push back at it, relentlessly but respectfully — otherwise the bullies will win,”

he said. Duncan advocates for meeting irrationality and hatred with respectful and well-reasoned arguments.

Duncan remarked that for him, the secret to dealing with judicial disagreement is to have a detachment from the job or case at hand.

By separating one’s feelings and opinion from the law, a judge can decide a case both impartially and with civility, he said.

Duncan’s full lecture is available at this link (remarks begin at 18:06).

Tiny Home and Mortgage: Debt Buyer OneMain Fin. Grp Backed by Homeowner-Hostile Fifth Circuit

This is a 1089 square foot, 1.0 bathroom, single family home. This home is located at 906 S 4th St, Bangs, TX 76823. The value is $46,400.

Judge Ho’s Wife Lectures About Oral Argument at the Fifth Circuit, or any Circus, along with Judge Graves

Ms. Allyson Ho, an expert oral advocate and wife of Judge Jim Ho, advised attendees to have detailed knowledge of the panel of judges.

The Deleted Opinion: After the Before From the Dishonorable Fifth Circuit

Non prisoner Lamell obtains a partial reversal in his favor from a 3-panel which capitulated from their earlier opinion. LIT investigates why.

There’s a Bunch of Federal Judges Departing from this Financial Services Case, But Not Allyson Ho

US District Court Judge Lynn Hughes Departs Involuntarily While One Unnamed 5th Cir. Judge recuses (we assume Jones) and Owen departs too.

Despite Merger, Knight is Still Bringing Frivolous Lawsuits for Corrupt Petrobras Entities

However, from the oral arguments, Petrobras has strong support from Justice Brett Busby, a fmr Judge Tjoflat clerk (“a little gloss here”).

It’s A Win for Former Judge Suzanne Wooten as Shameful Collin County Settle

Collin County’s insurance co has agreed to pay $600K to settle a lawsuit filed by a former district judge wrongfully convicted of bribery.

What Happens When the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Goes Rogue? (is Trending)

When the Supreme Court allows a lower court to go rogue, it is going rogue itself says Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Linda Greenhouse.

BDF Hopkins Evidence for the Lender Lacks Credibility and Prima Facie Evidence to Warrant Foreclosure

There is NO AFFIDAVIT on the docket at the N.D. Tex. district court which qualifies as PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE of service in this foreclosure.

It’s All About the Key Laws During a Pandemic for This Home in Kingwood

Former Homeowners Evicted in June 2021 return to the Home in August and claim their rights to stay in the residence due to the Moratorium.

Who Sayeth Ally At the Fifth Circuit? LIT Was Just Talkin’ Predatory Lending Harvesting Billions for….

Today, Ally’s CEO claims it has leading market positions in its core franchises and one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry.

The Fifth Circuit Goes CrossCountry to Affirm Wrongful Foreclosure to a Non-Bank

Second, the homeowners say a CrossCountry rep advised them in March to pursue a loan modification to stave off foreclosure.

Courageous Suzanne Wooten Can Proceed With Law Suit Against Shameful Collin County

The Court finds that Wooten has stated a plausible claim that there was an official policy that caused her harm for the purposes of defeating a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.

Fifth Circuit Judge Stuart “Kyle” Duncan’s Public Persona at Stanford Law School is He’s An Outlaw
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top