APPELLANT JOANNA BURKE’s MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING PERMISSIONS AND EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS
FEB 12, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 13, 2023
MARCH 8, 2023
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
(SUA SPONTE ORDER TO DENY TIME TO REPLY INCLUDING A 3 JUDGE ORDER ISSUED)
Before King, Jones, and Smith, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s opposed motion to transfer this appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals is DENIED.
Considering the tragic and devastating loss of my husband of 64 years on September 4, 2022, and as noticed by letter dated February 7, 2023, this Appeal is proceeding before this Court.
The sole remaining elder, a victim of predatory lending[1] by way of lender institution fraud[2], and subsequent abuse of power by the judiciary[3] and government branches and/or agencies[4] for over twelve years, as named Appellant, now files this motion requesting permission for Joanna Burke to file electronically and for email notifications to be sent to joanna@2dobermans.com.
Appellant, Joanna Burke, pro se party, moves this court for permission to file electronically in the matter captioned above. Appellee’s counsel has not been contacted regarding this motion as no consent was available at the time of filing (on a Sunday).
Appellant has reviewed the Fifth Circuit ECF Information Page and understands the rules of e-filing. Appellant has access to a computer and the internet in order to e-file.
Appellant understands approval to e-filing requires appellant to register with PACER for a CM/ECF account with the Fifth Circuit and that appellant consents to electronic service at the email address registered to the appellant’s Fifth Circuit PACER account. Appellant understands consent to e-service requires that service of filings via US mail will be discontinued.
CONCLUSION
For the above reasons, Appellant seeks permission to e-file in this matter and for Notices by Email should be granted.
Respectfully submitted by email to the Court (Pro_se@ca5.uscourts.gov),
DATED: February 12, 2023
JOANNA BURKE
[1] Definition of “predatory lending”: Predatory lending is a term used to describe lending practices that exploit borrowers, particularly those who are vulnerable.
[2] Definition of “Lender institution fraud”: Lender institution fraud refers to fraudulent activities carried out by the lender or financial institution itself, such as engaging in predatory lending practices, including where a lender adds false income to a loan application. This type of behavior is considered a serious violation of the law. Lender institution fraud can result in significant financial harm to borrowers and undermines the integrity of the financial system.
[3] Definition of “abuse of power by the Judiciary”: Actions taken by judges or members of the judicial branch of government that exceed their lawful authority, violate ethical standards, or undermine the principles of justice.
[4] Definition of “abuse of power by the United States Government”: Actions taken by any branch and/or agency of the federal government that exceed their lawful authority, violate ethical standards, or undermine the principles of justice.
Wild West Hired Guns Misfire: PHH ONITY’s Cooked-Up n’ Cockamamie Arguments Implode
Judge Werlein recused in July and hence ONITY’s argument is frivolous, and their motion for summary judgment violates court procedures.
Southern District Court in Houston: Addressing the Missing USPS Express Mail with Specificity
All non-attorney pro se litigants must deliver or mail filings to the Clerk’s Office, as per SD TX Guidelines for Litigants Without Lawyers.
Texas Appellate Justice Ken Molberg: Statute of Limitations Suspended During Litigation and Appeal
That differs when you are in Federal Court on Appeal. It didn’t stop PHH and Mark Cronenwett from filing for nonjudicial foreclosure.
Texas Rustlers: Corralling Calculated Legal Bandits and Villainous Practices by Courtroom Outlaws
Behind Closed Doors: The Coordinated Efforts of Legal Bandits and Complicit Courts to Deprive Homeowners of Their Rights and Property.
Justice in the Wild West: One Fearless Widow’s Battle for Truth and Honor in the Federal Courthouse
The Texas Struggle: Defying Northern Banking Giants and Their Bounty Hunting Lawyers to Protect Her Home from Rustlers and Thieves
Including the How: Addressing the Missing Piece in Quoting Fraud with Specificity
In Plaintiff’s prior response, under section F. Burke Fails to Assert a Claim for Fraud, the How element was inadvertently omitted.
Federal Bankruptcy Judge Lopez: I Don’t Read Words Into Statutes. I Read What They Say and I Follow It
Texas Supreme Court Justice Blacklock: Why should the court give the lender rights it didn’t bargain for to get paid?
A Wild West Blunder: PHH’s Hired Bounty Hunters at Hopkins Law Deliver a Cockamamie Response
Gunsmoke and Legal Misfires: PHH’s Reply Misses the Mark. Hopkins Law’s Cockamamie Response Turns Legal Logic into High Noon Nonsense.
Texas Law Professors on Bankruptcy and Civil Rights Won’t Confront Premeditated Judicial Misconduct
Three lauded Texas University law schools employ these academics. Despite their resumes centered on civil rights, they refuse to defend them.
Second Quick-Fire Ruling by Federal Magistrate Judge Challenges Integrity of Her Own Scheduling Order
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
Quick-Fire Ruling by Federal Magistrate Judge Challenges Integrity of Her Own Scheduling Order
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
Federal Court Bailouts: The Troubling Connection Between PHH Mortgage Corp. and Judicial Corruption
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division’s Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism.
