Fifth Circuit

This Putty Didn’t Fill the Holes

Posted on

Putty’s pleadings therefore failed to provide Fannie Mae with fair notice that she intended to assert a RESPA violation, and the district court properly declined to consider this claim.

Share this post:

Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn

KING, CARLOYN DINEEN, (MRS. REAVLEY)

ELROD, JENNIFER W.

HIGGINSON, STEPHEN A.

Putty was, unfortunately, without argument.

“Putty’s pleadings therefore failed to provide Fannie Mae with fair notice that she intended to assert a RESPA violation, and the district court properly declined to consider this claim.“

Panel consisted of: KING, ELROD & HIGGINSON

PUTTY v FNMA

Share this post:

Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn
Related Items:, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Recommended for you

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

125
Bankers

Texas Most Wanted: Walsh Hires Bandit Lawyer Robert Clayton “Clay” Vilt to Stop Harris County Foreclosure
DONATE TO THE LAST STAND
112
Editors Choice

Negative Theory: Protecting the Press and Online Media Platforms from Government Interference and Retaliation
110
Debt Collector

Oil and Gas Executive Paul Brogan’s $2.5m Property is Entrusted to a Legal Bandit to Save from Foreclosure
105
Judges

After Judge’s Outburst, Her Courtroom in North Carolina Becomes An Execution Chambers
101
Bankers

From Foreclosure to Courtroom: The Ongoing Saga of the Larson Estate vs. Deutsche Bank
96
Bankers

Entxar Elloprop, LLC of Katy, Texas v. MidFirst Bank and Bandit Mark Cronenwett, Freelancing Bounty Hunter
To Top