Dark Money

Eighth Circuit Choice Sparks Outrage: Violent Criminal’s Rights Prevail as Elderly Citizen Denied Justice

Fairness in Federal Judiciary’s Service and Remand Orders Questioned as Eighth Circuit Asserts Robber’s Rights Trump Elderly Citizen’s Needs.

Man accused in armed robbery of bank waves arraignment

JUL 20, 2011 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 5, 2024
FEB 5, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

HORNERSVILLE, MO (KFVS) – A man accused of robbing a Dunklin County bank on July 19 appeared in court on Friday.

According to the Dunklin County Circuit Clerk, George Proby Jr. was in court for arraignment at 9:00 am this morning.

Proby appeared with his attorney and waived arraignment.

His next court date is set for August 19 at 9:00 a.m.

Police have released the name of a man suspected of trying to rob a Dunklin County bank Tuesday.

Sheriff Bob Holder says he has probable cause to believe that George J. Proby, Jr. of West Memphis, Ark. committed robbery first degree and armed criminal action.

The probable cause statement continues that Proby entered Focus Bank on July 19, 2011 around 12:15 p.m. in Hornersville with the intent to rob the bank.

Proby then jumped over the counter to where the tellers worked, displayed a gun and demanded money, said Holder.

Proby shot the gun twice, according to Holder. The first shot was fired through an office door with the bullet just missing the teller working the window. The second shot was fired through a double pane window in the rear bathroom where Proby fled with the gun and stolen money, according to the statement.

Proby was caught by police a short distance from the bank, said Holder.

Holder says Proby is schedule to appear in court on Friday.

Proby v. Corizon Med. Servs., No. 20-2018

(8th Cir. Oct. 28, 2020)

No. 20-2018

10-28-2020

George Proby, Jr. Plaintiff – Appellant v. Corizon Medical Services; T. Bredeman, Corizon Director of Operations, Associate Regional Medical Director; J. Cofield, Director of Operations for Constituent Services, Head Grievance Officer; Unknown Hucke, Corizon Dr. at JCCC; Pamela Swartz, Corizon Nurse Practitioner at JCCC; Rebecca Grahm, Corizon Nurse Practitioner at JCCC; Philip Tippen; Paul F. Montany Defendants – Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri – Cape Girardeau [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

George Proby, Jr. sued numerous defendants in federal district court for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and for conspiracy to deny medical care. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985.

The complaint named Corizon Medical Services, T. Bredeman, Pamela Swartz, Rebecca Grahm, Hucke, Phillip Tippen, Paul F. Montany, and J. Cofield, in their individual and official capacities.

The district court dismissed his complaint in its entirety, before he had a chance to serve them.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The district court properly dismissed some of the claims.

Among them were the official-capacity claims against J. Cofield, either under the Eleventh Amendment or section 1983 itself.

See Murphy v. Arkansas, 127 F.3d 750, 754 (8th Cir. 1997).

Proby also did not plead enough facts to allege a conspiracy.

See Manis v. Sterling, 862 F.2d 679, 681 (8th Cir. 1988)

(stating that, to plead a conspiracy, there must be enough to show a “meeting of the minds”

(quotation marks omitted)).

Others should not have been dismissed.

The first is the allegation against Corizon that it violated his constitutional rights through a policy, custom, or official action.

See Smith v. Insley’s Inc., 499 F.3d 875, 880-81 (8th Cir. 2007).

Also falling into this category are Proby’s claims against the remaining defendants that they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs.

See Dadd v. Anoka Cnty., 827 F.3d 749, 755 (8th Cir. 2016)

(delaying treatment or examinations can amount to a constitutional violation when the underlying condition is “medically serious or painful” (quotation marks omitted));

Phillips v. Jasper Cnty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 796 (8th Cir. 2006)

(“fail[ing] to administer prescribed medication,” if done knowingly, can establish deliberate indifference);

Smith v. Jenkins, 919 F.2d 90, 93 (8th Cir. 1990)

(choosing the “easier and less efficacious course of treatment” can constitute deliberate indifference).

To sum up, neither the official-capacity claims against Cofield nor the conspiracy claims survive.

But all remaining claims can proceed, at least at this stage. We accordingly remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including service of process on the remaining defendants.

Case submitted

reversing district court denial of appeal and granting IFP status,

without briefing allowed to CA8 on Monday, Oct.  19, 2020

with decision rendered on Wed., Oct. 28, 2024

reversing in part and allowing process of service on a laundry list of defendants.

General Docket
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Docket #: 20-2018 Docketed: 05/21/2020
Termed: 10/28/2020
Nature of Suit: 3555 Prison Condition
George Proby, Jr. v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri – Cape Girardeau
Fee Status: plra
Case Type Information:
     1) Prisoner
     2) State
     3) Civil Rights
Originating Court Information:
     District: 0865-1 : 1:18-cv-00293-SNLJ
     Trial Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh, Junior, U.S. District Judge
     Date Filed: 12/18/2018
     Date Order/Judgment:      Date NOA Filed:      Date Rec’d COA:
     04/27/2020      05/18/2020      05/21/2020

05/21/2020 Open Document Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Memorandum and Order 4/27/20, Order of Dismissal 4/27/20, docket entries, [4915515] [20-2018] (AEV) [Entered: 05/21/2020 01:32 PM]
05/21/2020 Open Document CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4915518] [20-2018] (AEV) [Entered: 05/21/2020 01:33 PM]
05/28/2020 Open Document Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 05/22/2020 Denying IFP on appeal, [4917652] [20-2018] (AEV) [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:01 AM]
05/28/2020 UPDATED fee status – [Case Number 20-2018: due] [4917654] [20-2018] (AEV) [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:01 AM]
05/28/2020 Open Document CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/25/2020, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4917656] [20-2018] (AEV) [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:02 AM]
06/17/2020 Open Restricted Document MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. George Proby, Jr. w/service 06/17/2020. [4924816] [20-2018] (AEV) [Entered: 06/17/2020 03:57 PM]
10/19/2020 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Roger L. Wollman, David R. Stras in St. Louis [4969231] [20-2018] (AMT) [Entered: 10/26/2020 08:50 AM]
10/28/2020 Open Document PER CURIAM OPINION FILED – THE COURT: Raymond W. Gruender, Roger L. Wollman and David R. Stras (UNPUBLISHED) [4970298] [20-2018] (CMD) [Entered: 10/28/2020 09:13 AM]
10/28/2020 Open Document JUDGMENT FILED – The judgment of the originating court is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED in accordance with the opinion. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been considered and is granted. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The court remands the calculation of the installments and the collection of the fees to the district court. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, ROGER L. WOLLMAN and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Oct 2020 [4970300] [20-2018] (CMD) [Entered: 10/28/2020 09:16 AM]
11/18/2020 Open Document MANDATE ISSUED. [4976947] [20-2018] (LMT) [Entered: 11/18/2020 10:38 AM]

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
8th Circuit Court of Appeals – 02/05/2024 17:29:45

Active and Senior Judges

Active Judges

Hon. Lavenski R. Smith, Chief Judge – Little Rock, AR – Appointed July 19, 2002
Hon. James B. Loken – Minneapolis, MN – Appointed October 17, 1990
Hon. Steven M. Colloton – Des Moines, IA – Appointed September 10, 2003
Hon. Raymond W. Gruender – St. Louis, MO – Appointed June 5, 2004
Hon. Duane Benton – Kansas City, MO – Appointed July 2, 2004
Hon. Bobby E. Shepherd – El Dorado, AR – Appointed October 10, 2006
Hon. Jane Kelly – Cedar Rapids, IA – Appointed April 25, 2013
Hon. Ralph R. Erickson – Fargo, ND – Appointed October 13, 2017
Hon. L. Steven Grasz – Omaha, NE – Appointed January 4, 2018
Hon. David R. Stras – Minneapolis, MN – Appointed January 31, 2018
Hon. Jonathan A. Kobes – Sioux Falls, SD – Appointed December 18, 2018

Senior Judges

Hon. Roger L. Wollman – Sioux Falls, SD – Appointed July 22, 1985
Hon. Morris S. Arnold – Little Rock, AR – Appointed May 26, 1992
Hon. Michael J. Melloy – Cedar Rapids, IA – Appointed February 14, 2002

Joanna Burke v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al, No. 23-3593

(8th Cir)

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED AFTER FOLLOWING TWEET ON 16 FEB, 2024

Joanna Burke v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al, No. 23-3593

(8th Cir. Feb 5, 2024)

2012 File Photo: Shows two of the three CA8 panel judges in Burke’s case on the bench 12 years later in 2024, with RAYMOND W. GRUENDER sitting on both the Burke’s appeal and Prody’s appeal.

JUDGMENT

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

This court has reviewed the original file of the United States District Court. It is ordered by the court that the judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed.

See Eighth Circuit Rule 47B.

February 05, 2024

Order Entered at the Direction of the Court: Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

/s/ Michael E. Gans

Case submitted without briefing allowed to CA8 on Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2024

with no formal written opinion addressing the many due process, constitutional issues raised by Burke,

including the rather important fact that the second assigned Magistrate Judge represented the defendants, PHH Mortgage Corp., prior to joining the bench and he (David Schultz) would not self-recuse, but immediately issued an order in favor of his former client, PHH.

The “sua sponte order” by CA8  was rendered in rapid time, three business days after submission, on Monday, Feb. 5, 2024,

The court cited to an obscure, unused Local Rule 47(b)

to end the appeal with a one line perfunctory affirmation of the lower courts unethical and unconstitutional acts, and

in violation of their prior opinions mirroring the facts in Burke’s case (e.g. process of service).

Rule 47 (b) Procedure When There Is No Controlling Law.

A court of appeals may regulate practice in a particular case in any manner consistent with federal law, these rules, and local rules of the circuit. No sanction or other disadvantage may be imposed for non compliance with any requirement not in federal law, federal rules, or the local circuit rules unless the alleged violator has been furnished in the particular case with actual notice of the requirement.

LIT Commentary

It is clear CA8 is using the second sentence to say that because no service was issued or executed upon the defendants, we don’t need to even respond to this appeal.

However, this fails for two main reasons:

First, this one sentence does not address the issues at the lower court or on appeal. There are questions of law that needed to be decided outwith the process of service and do not need their involvement as it is against the “judicial machinery itself” – which is the substance of Joanna Burke’s actual 100-page complaint…

Second, compared with the Proby appeal, which was also not briefed and did not include any responses by defendants in his case – if precedent is being applied, Rule 47(b) does not apply as Proby’s case was remanded to effect service.

Furthermore, Proby’s other questions of law were answered by a 3-panel which included RAYMOND W. GREUNDER, who also appeared in the Burke 3-panel.

Following precedent and federal law, the same due process on appeal was not applied to law-abiding citizen Joanna Burke’s case, but granted to a jailed felon, and notably after the appeal court overturned the district court’s denial of IFP status for Proby.

General Docket
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Docket #: 23-3593 Docketed: 11/28/2023
Termed: 02/05/2024
Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights
Joanna Burke v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Fee Status: paid – cs
Case Type Information:
     1) Civil
     2) Private
     3) null
Originating Court Information:
     District: 0864-0 : 0:23-cv-01119-WMW
     Trial Judge: Wilhelmina M. Wright, U.S. District Judge
     Magistrate: David T. Schultz, US Magistrate Judge
     Date Filed: 04/19/2023
     Date Order/Judgment:      Date NOA Filed:      Date Rec’d COA:
     10/30/2023      11/25/2023      11/27/2023

11/28/2023 Open Document Civil case docketed. [5339369] [23-3593] (ASL) [Entered: 11/28/2023 02:48 PM]
11/28/2023 Open Document Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 11/25/2023, Report and Recommendation filed 8/30/2023, Order filed 10/30/2023, Judgment filed 10/30/2023, and docket entries, [5339377] [23-3593] (ASL) [Entered: 11/28/2023 03:01 PM]
11/28/2023 Open Document CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5339380] [23-3593] (ASL) [Entered: 11/28/2023 03:03 PM]
01/31/2024 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Steven M. Colloton, Raymond W. Gruender, Jane Kelly in St. Louis [5360344] [23-3593] (BNW) [Entered: 02/05/2024 02:11 PM]
02/05/2024 Open Document JUDGMENT FILED – The judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47B. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and JANE KELLY Adp Jan 2024 [5360367] [23-3593] (BNW) [Entered: 02/05/2024 02:25 PM]

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
8th Circuit Court of Appeals – 02/06/2024 05:17:44

Active and Senior Judges

Active Judges

Hon. Lavenski R. Smith, Chief Judge – Little Rock, AR – Appointed July 19, 2002
Hon. James B. Loken – Minneapolis, MN – Appointed October 17, 1990
Hon. Steven M. Colloton – Des Moines, IA – Appointed September 10, 2003
Hon. Raymond W. Gruender – St. Louis, MO – Appointed June 5, 2004
Hon. Duane Benton – Kansas City, MO – Appointed July 2, 2004
Hon. Bobby E. Shepherd – El Dorado, AR – Appointed October 10, 2006
Hon. Jane Kelly – Cedar Rapids, IA – Appointed April 25, 2013
Hon. Ralph R. Erickson – Fargo, ND – Appointed October 13, 2017
Hon. L. Steven Grasz – Omaha, NE – Appointed January 4, 2018
Hon. David R. Stras – Minneapolis, MN – Appointed January 31, 2018
Hon. Jonathan A. Kobes – Sioux Falls, SD – Appointed December 18, 2018

Senior Judges

Hon. Roger L. Wollman – Sioux Falls, SD – Appointed July 22, 1985
Hon. Morris S. Arnold – Little Rock, AR – Appointed May 26, 1992
Hon. Michael J. Melloy – Cedar Rapids, IA – Appointed February 14, 2002

Proby v. Corizon Medical Services

(1:18-cv-00293)

District Court, E.D. Missouri

DEC 18, 2018

U.S. District Court
Eastern District of Missouri (Cape Girardeau)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:18-cv-00293-SNLJ

Proby v. Corizon Medical Services et al
Assigned to: Sr. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr

Case in other court:  Missouri Western, 2:18-cv-04253

Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Date Filed: 12/18/2018
Date Terminated: 05/20/2021
Jury Demand: Both
Nature of Suit: 555 Prisoner Petitions – Prison Conditions
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
George Proby, Jr. represented by George Proby, Jr.
#1237464
NECC
Northeast Correctional Center
13698 Airport Road
Bowling Green, MO 63334
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Corizon, LLC
TERMINATED: 03/15/2021
represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
Office of Professional Liability Claims
103 Powell Court
Brentwood, TN 37027
Email: incident.reports@corizonhealth.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJ. Thaddeus Eckenrode
ECKENRODE-MAUPIN
11477 Olde Cabin Road
Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63141
314-726-6670
Fax: 314-726-2106
Email: jte@eckenrode-law.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Dr. Thomas Bredeman
TERMINATED: 03/15/2021
represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJ. Thaddeus Eckenrode
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Jewel Cofield
TERMINATED: 03/15/2021
represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJ. Thaddeus Eckenrode
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDOffice of Missouri Attorney General
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI – Jefferson City
207 W. High St.
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899
573-751-3321
Email: tender@ago.mo.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Kayla Nivert
Corizon Nurse at MCC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Dr. Heyden Hucke
TERMINATED: 04/02/2021
represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Narendrashinh Khengar
Corizon Dr. at JCCC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Dr. Ruanne Stamps
Corizon Dr. at MCC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Tipton
Corizon Dr. at SECC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Pamala Swartz represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJ. Thaddeus Eckenrode
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Rebekah Graham
TERMINATED: 03/15/2021
represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJ. Thaddeus Eckenrode
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Jackie Unknown
Corizon Nurse at SECC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Molly Unknown
Corizon Health Service Administrator at SECC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Collette Rodgers
Corizon Director of Nursing at JCCC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Deborah Willis
Corizon Director of Nursing at MCC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Jason Lewis
SECC Warden of Operations
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
April Samples
SECC Case Manager
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Heather Tidwell
Corizon Nurse at SECC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Paula Reed
SECC Assistant Warden of Operations
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Young
SECC Function Unit Manager
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Heather Alexander
Corizon Nurse at SECC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Christy Unknown
Corizon Nurse at SECC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Courtney Unknown
Corizon Nurse at MCC
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Missouri Deparment of Corrections
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Dean Minor
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Bonnie Boley
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Laurel Davison
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Audrey Ford
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Amanda Unknown
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Unknown Stoner
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Christina Unknown
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Unknown Lawson
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Unknown Jochem
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Unknown Bell
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Molly Leija
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Martin Unknown
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Aaron Legrand
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Blake Moutray
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Ralph Vanlandingham
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Dr. Phillip Tippen
TERMINATED: 03/15/2021
represented by Corizon Health, Inc.
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJ. Thaddeus Eckenrode
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Larry Grahm
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Christy Williams
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Megan Unknown
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Unknown Lynch
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Unknown Harriston
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Sydney Serr
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Ryan Crews
TERMINATED: 10/28/2019
Defendant
Paul F. Montany
TERMINATED: 04/27/2020

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
03/11/2021 57 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Thomas Bredeman, Jewel Cofield, Corizon, LLC, Rebekah Graham, Phillip Tippen STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Eckenrode, J.) (Entered: 03/11/2021)
03/15/2021 58 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL re 57 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Rebekah Graham, Corizon, LLC, Phillip Tippen, Jewel Cofield, Thomas Bredeman. In accordance with the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice, entered into by plaintiff and defendants Corizon, LLC, Dr. Phillip Tippen, Dr. Thomas Bredeman, Rebekah Graham and Jewel Cofield, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants Corizon, LLC, Dr. Phillip Tippen, Dr. Thomas Bredeman, Rebekah Graham and Jewel Cofield are DISMISSED withprejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in accordance with the Stipulation for Dismissal, each party shall bear its own costs. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Corizon, LLC, Rebekah Graham, Phillip Tippen, Thomas Bredeman and Jewel Cofield terminated. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/15/21. (CSG) (Entered: 03/15/2021)
04/02/2021 59 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Dr. Heyden Hucke are DISMISSED, without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P.4(m) Heyden Hucke terminated. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/2/21. (CSG) (Entered: 04/02/2021)
04/28/2021 60 **VACATED on 5/4/21** ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, file a motion for entry of default by the Clerk of the Court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the claims against defendant Pamela Swartz in this matter without prejudice. Response to Court due by 5/19/2021. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/28/21. (CSG) Modified on 5/4/2021 (CSG). (Entered: 04/28/2021)
04/30/2021 61 ENTRY of Appearance by J. Thaddeus Eckenrode for Defendant Pamala Swartz. (Eckenrode, J.) (Entered: 04/30/2021)
04/30/2021 62 MOTION for Leave to File Answer Out of Time by Defendant Pamala Swartz. (Eckenrode, J.) (Entered: 04/30/2021)
04/30/2021 63 ANSWER to Complaint ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND REQUEST FOR TRIAL BY JURY OF DEFENDANT PAMELA SWARTZ by Pamala Swartz.(Eckenrode, J.) (Entered: 04/30/2021)
05/04/2021 64 ORDER re 62 MOTION for Leave to File Answer Out of Time filed by Pamala Swartz. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Pamela Swartz’ motion for leave to file her answer out of time [Doc. #62] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the April 28, 2021 Order requiring plaintiff to file a motion for entry of default [Doc. #60] is VACATED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/4/21. (CSG) (Entered: 05/04/2021)
05/04/2021 65 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 5: Prisoner Standard. Motion to Join Parties due by 6/4/2021. Discovery Completion due by 10/4/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 10/4/2021. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/4/21. (CSG) (Entered: 05/04/2021)
05/19/2021 66 STIPULATION JOINT STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Defendant Pamala Swartz. (Eckenrode, J.) (Entered: 05/19/2021)
05/20/2021 67 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/20/21. (CSG) (Entered: 05/20/2021)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
02/05/2024 15:49:41

Texas: The $4 Million Dollar Wrongful Foreclosure Judgment Against Deutsche Bank and PHH Ocwen

Texan Dilemma: Will the corrupt Texas Courts and Gov. collude to settle with Deutsche Bank and PHH Ocwen, or obliterate $4M judgment?

The Greatest Theft: Ocwen PHH Mortgage Premeditated Long-Term Scheme to Steal Citizens Homes

Ocwen PHH’s egregious act was to use HAMP to POSTPONE foreclosures and add big balloon payments, NOT to help homeowners keep their homes.

8th Circuit to PHH: The Party Seeking Equitable Subrogation Must Be Without Fault

The blame for the uncertainty regarding GMAC’s – now PHH Ocwen’s lien position lies with GMAC. GMAC agents prepared the flawed mortgage docs.

Eighth Circuit Choice Sparks Outrage: Violent Criminal’s Rights Prevail as Elderly Citizen Denied Justice
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top