Debt Collector

We’re Dealin’. Let’s Get Informal for the Car Salesman

Nicolas v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, S.D. Texas still percolatin’ informally since October 2020 and no movement on docket as at 8 July 2021.

Nicolas v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al

4:20-CV-01263, S.D. Tex. – before Judge Eskridge

MAR 20, 2021

UPDATE; No movement on this case as at Thursday, July 8, 2021.

Plaintiff Nicolas S. Nicolas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for American Home
Mortgage Investment Trust 2006-3 (“Deutsche Bank”) (collectively, the “Parties”) file this Joint Status Report Concerning Settlement pursuant to this Court’s Order dated September 16, 2020, and would respectfully show the Court as follows:

This action involves a dispute over a mortgage loan (the “Loan”) that was originated in August of 2005 and is secured by Plaintiff’s residence located at 84 W. Sandalbranch Cir., The Woodlands, TX 77382 (the “Property”).

Plaintiff alleges that he began experiencing financial difficulties in late 2008 due to the failure of his auto sales business.

He alleges that he has been working with the servicers and/or owners of the Loan, including, most recently, Deutsche Bank (the current owner) and PHH (the current servicer), to identify loss mitigation alternatives.

The claims enumerated in Plaintiff’s complaint are premised on his contention that he has not been properly considered for loss mitigation alternatives.

Defendants deny Plaintiff’s contention.

Since the outset of this case, the Parties have been engaged in settlement discussions with the hope that they can identify potential loss mitigation alternatives that will
assist Plaintiff in retaining the Property.

In connection with these discussions, Defendants have asked Plaintiff for certain financial information that will enable them to assess his current financial circumstances. This information is intended to inform Defendants in their efforts to identify loss mitigation alternatives.

As of the date of this report, Plaintiff is still working to provide Defendants with all of the information they require. Once Defendants have received this information, they are hopeful that they can promptly identify potential loss mitigation alternatives.

Based on the current posture of the Parties’ negotiations, they prefer to continue to with their informal settlement discussions rather than commit to a mediation at this time.

In fact, a mediation would be premature at this time because: (1) Plaintiff is focused on a resolution structured around loss mitigation alternatives; and (2) Defendants cannot identify loss mitigation alternatives available to Plaintiff until they have received all of the required financial information.

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Greg DeVries

State Bar No. 24065862

18201 Von Karman Ave, Ste 350
Irvine CA 92612
Telephone : (949) 381-5900
Facsimile: (949) 271-4040


State Bar No. 24105802
1001 McKinney, Suite 1500
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone : (713) 520-1900
Facsimile: (713) 520-1025


By: /s/ Brandy Alexander

Brandy Michelle Alexander
State Bar No. 24108241

Alexander Law, PLLC
6200 Savoy Drive, Suite 1202
Houston, Texas 77036
Telephone: (832)-460-3307
Facsimile: (832)-460-3334





I hereby certify that on October 31, 2020, a copy of the above and foregoing was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing has been forwarded to all parties, by and through their attorneys of record, in accordance with FederalRules of Civil Procedure.

U.S. District Court
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:20-cv-01263


Nicolas v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
Assigned to: Judge Charles Eskridge

Case in other court:  410th District Court of Montgomery County, TX, 20-00003-02961

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Date Filed: 04/09/2020
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 290 Real Property: Other
Jurisdiction: Diversity

There are proceedings for case 4:20-cv-01263 but none satisfy the selection criteria.

(e.g. nothing filed since this Oct. 30, 2020 update – as at 20 March, 2021)

PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Rodney Johnson Sr, S.D. Texas

The lack of transparency in certain court cases in the Southern District Federal Court, Houston Div’n has been ratcheted up in recent months.

Class of 2021: LIT’s Spotted Trappin’ Lawyers in Front of the Singin’ Millionaire Judge Eskridge, S. D. Tex.

Class Action lawyer James Kauffman attempted to intervene in a similar case in Fl, Morris v. PHH Mortgage Corporation (0:20-cv-60633), District Court, S.D. Florida, citing this case in TX. He did not fare well.

Tina Alexander’s Bank Returns to S.D. Federal Court in Houston But She’s Armed with Supreme Court Constitutional Lawyers from LA. We Assume to Attack the Priester Ruling in Her Prior Case(s) at the Fifth Circuit

Tina Alexander returns to SDTX and her case is assigned to Judge Ellison, who recently had a spat with Judge Jerry Smith of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. This time she’s lawyered up and ready to attack Priester which was used against her in prior opinions by the 5th.

We’re Dealin’. Let’s Get Informal for the Car Salesman
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top