Federal Judges

We Need Five More Judges to Control the Crime From “The Indian Country”, Oh, and More Courthouses

McGirt, a case in which the Court held that parts of eastern Oklahoma are an Indian reservation subject to exclusive federal jurisdiction.

Judiciary Supplements Judgeship Request, Prioritizes Courthouse Projects

US Courts are supplementing because they want their pending Budget(s) and more importantly, the Ability to Jail People for Posting federal Judges personal details Online.

Judges are no longer public servants, they are demanding security only matched by the President of the United States.

SEP 28, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: SEP 28, 2021

On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. “[no] State or Territory [shall] ever have a right to pass laws for the government of such Indians, but they shall be allowed to govern themselves.”

The Judiciary’s policy-making body today recommended that Congress create new judgeships because of a rapid and substantial rise in felony prosecutions in two districts.

The Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma held that land allotted by an 1832 treaty between the Creek Nation and the United States Government remains “Indian Country” for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act. The decision was later extended to four additional Indian nations and shifted the prosecution of the most serious crimes on tribal land from state court to federal or tribal court in much of the eastern part of Oklahoma.

Supporting Statistics

Criminal Cases Commenced, Terminated, and Pending in Oklahoma Northern and Eastern (pdf)
Period ending June 30, 2021

Judicial Caseload Profile, Oklahoma Eastern (pdf)
Period ending June 30, 2021

Judicial Caseload Profile, Oklahoma Northern (pdf)
Period ending June 30, 2021

This has caused the number of criminal cases filed in the Eastern District of Oklahoma to jump more than 400 percent and the Northern District of Oklahoma to increase by nearly 200 percent from 2020 to 2021.

As a result, the Conference is recommending that Congress authorize three new judgeships in the Eastern District of Oklahoma and two in the Northern District of Oklahoma.

The Eastern District currently has one authorized judgeship, the Northern District has three, and the two districts share a judgeship.

The request for these five judgeships supplements the recommendation the Judicial Conference adopted in March 2021 and transmitted to Congress to create 79 new judgeships in federal courts across the country.

At its meeting today the Judicial Conference also approved its fiscal year 2023 Federal Judiciary Courthouse Project Priorities (CPP) list. Hato Rey, Puerto Rico, remains a judicial space emergency because of earthquake risks and is prioritized above all new courthouse construction projects.

A seismic retrofit is planned for the Degetau Federal Building, and the significant impact it would have on district court components housed in that building supports the project’s emergency designation. (The Federico Degetau Federal Building and the Clemente Ruiz Nazario United States Courthouse compose the Hato Rey Federal Court Complex.)

Courthouses in Hartford, Connecticut, and Chattanooga, Tennessee, have been identified as projects for which the Judiciary will request additional federal funding in its annual budget submission.

These projects already received partial funding, including $135.5 million for Harford and $94.5 million for Chattanooga. In addition, the following projects have been identified as out-year courthouse priorities — Bowling Green, Kentucky; Anchorage, Alaska; McAllen, Texas; Greensboro/Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and Norfolk, Virginia.

The federal courthouse construction program is administered jointly by the Judiciary and the General Services Administration (GSA).

The Judiciary establishes priorities for courthouse construction projects and sets the housing requirements for each project to ensure that completed facilities meet the needs of the courts. GSA secures the funding for construction, acquires the building site, and completes design and construction work on the facilities.

The Judiciary annually identifies potential locations for new courthouses, annexes, and/or major renovation of courthouses that have the most urgent space needs in the CPP list.

The 26-member Judicial Conference (pdf) is the policy-making body for the federal court system. By statute, the Chief Justice of the United States serves as its presiding officer and its members are the chief judges of the 13 courts of appeals, a district judge from each of the 12 geographic circuits, and the chief judge of the Court of International Trade.

The Conference convenes twice a year to consider administrative and policy issues affecting the court system, and to make recommendations to Congress concerning legislation involving the Judicial Branch.

The Conference conducted its regularly scheduled biannual meeting today by teleconference due to the pandemic.

Why Pay for Lifetime Federal Judge’s ‘Protection’ When They Are Lyin’, Cheatin’ and Stealin’ from Citizens?

Judiciary leaders are expressing deep concern that Congress has failed to provide funding to protect federal judges. LIT says don’t fund ’em.

Why Should We Pay for Federal Judges Enhanced Security and Stacking the Courts with More Corrupt Outlaws in Robes?

The federal judiciary seeks $8.1 Billion dollars for the 2022 fiscal year, an increased request of funds at just under 5% over the prior year. It should be rejected.

LIT Opposes The Federal Judiciary Request for $8 Billion Funding and Here’s Why Congress Should Too

The Federal Judiciary has asked Congress for $8.12 billion to fund judicial branch operations for fiscal year 2022. This should be rejected.

We Need Five More Judges to Control the Crime From “The Indian Country”, Oh, and More Courthouses
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top