The Texas Struggle: Defying Northern Banking Giants and Their Bounty Hunting Lawyers to Protect Her Home from Rustlers and Thieves
In Plaintiff’s prior response, under section F. Burke Fails to Assert a Claim for Fraud, the How element was inadvertently omitted.
Texas Supreme Court Justice Blacklock: Why should the court give the lender rights it didn’t bargain for to get paid?
Gunsmoke and Legal Misfires: PHH’s Reply Misses the Mark. Hopkins Law’s Cockamamie Response Turns Legal Logic into High Noon Nonsense.
Three lauded Texas University law schools employ these academics. Despite their resumes centered on civil rights, they refuse to defend them.
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
Klayman’s six lawsuits are neither so prolific, frivolous or harassing that they threaten the order or integrity of the courts’ operations.
Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division's Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism.
A true and accurate copy of the legal filings presented by Plaintiff has not been uploaded to the docket prior to release...
The Southern District of Texas Houston Division's Federal Court Scandals mount as this case presents a further example of Judicial Activism from...
The “Jones Romance Scandal” exemplifies a broader issue in the courthouse, revealing attempts to maintain invented jurisdiction in this case.
Seven years of litigation by the tenants against their landlords in both state and federal court ends in dismissal with prejudice.
Pro se litigant Van Deelen's involvement became an irritant, an unwanted delay to the judge and lawyers thirst for financial greed.
If the law and Const. is applied correctly by an impartial judiciary who follow the rule of law it should have no...
Burke v PHH Ocwen, Hopkins Law, PLLC, Mark Hopkins and Shelley Hopkins before Bent Judge Al Bennett, SDTX, Houston.
The Wilders’ irresponsible and inflammatory accusation is a contemptuous insult to the federal district court, Judge Ada Brown, N.D. Texas.
This is the Pro Se's ninth lawsuit involving the foreclosure of the Property and third lawsuit against the Attorney Defendant Barrett Daffin.