Bounty Hunters

Reversed: Fifth Circuit Judge Andy Oldham Rejects Ditech Foreclosure Attempts As Time-Barred

Khaliq Bryant sued to quiet title on property in Texas. The district court dismissed Bryant’s suit for failure to state a claim. We reverse.

Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC

(3:22-cv-00252)

District Court, N.D. Texas

UPDATE: NOV 20, 2024 – NO SIGNS OF RETURN FROM ADR

Clerk’s ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to James M. Daugherty. (kcr) (Entered: 10/15/2024)

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Mark D. Cronenwett filed by Ditech Financial LLC, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 09/12/2024)

U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Dallas)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:22-cv-00252-B

Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC
Assigned to: Judge Jane J Boyle

Case in other court:  44th Judicial District Court Dallas County TX, DC-22-00465

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Date Filed: 02/02/2022
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 290 Real Property: All Other Real Property
Jurisdiction: Diversity

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
09/03/2024 64 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT and Second Amended Counterclaim against James M. Daugherty filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Plaintiff will submit third-party summons(es) for issuance. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A and B) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 09/03/2024)
09/05/2024 65 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 09/05/2024)
09/05/2024 66 Designation of Mediator by Khaliq Bryant. (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 09/05/2024)
09/09/2024 67 MEDIATION ORDER. The court appoints T King Fifer as mediator. Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary form provided electronically or by US Mail as appropriate. Deadline for mediation is on or before 5/30/2025. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/9/2024) (ndt) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/09/2024 69 PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/9/2024) (agc) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/2024 68 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/10/2024 70 Summons Issued as to James M. Daugherty. (kcr) (Entered: 09/10/2024)
09/12/2024 71 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Mark D. Cronenwett filed by Ditech Financial LLC, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 09/12/2024)
09/13/2024 72 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 71 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Mark D Cronenwett terminated (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/13/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 09/13/2024)
09/13/2024 73 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to James M. Daugherty ; served on 9/12/2024. (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 09/13/2024)
10/11/2024 74 Request for Clerk to issue Clerk’s Entry of Default against Third Party Defendant James M. Daugherty filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s), # 2 Proposed Order) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/11/2024 75 MOTION for Default Judgment against James M. Daugherty filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s), # 2 Proposed Order) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 10/11/2024)
10/15/2024 76 Clerk’s ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to James M. Daugherty. (kcr) (Entered: 10/15/2024)
11/01/2024 77 Designation of Experts by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 11/01/2024)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
11/20/2024 18:33:12

LITX

Oct 25, 2024

Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC

(3:22-cv-00252)

District Court, N.D. Texas

FEB 2, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: AUG 26, 2024
AUG 26, OCT 25, 2024

Off to ADR with y’all sayeth Judge on Sep. 10, 2024….uhuh.

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

“What the lender cannot do is win by speculating that a piece of property was sold four times, that the loan went unpaid for 10-15 years and that the lender nonetheless sat idly by without ever protecting its rights.”

Bryant v. DiTech Fin. (5th Cir., 2024)

Sep 10, 2024: Order For ADR

This case is set for trial beginning Monday 10/27/2025 before Judge Jane J Boyle.

Joinder of Parties due by 9/2/2024.

Amended Pleadings due by 9/2/2024.

Motions due by 3/3/2025.

Discovery due by 3/3/2025.

Deadline for mediation is on or before 5/30/2025.

Pretrial Order due by 10/14/2025.

Pretrial Materials due by 10/14/2025.

Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2025 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J Boyle.

(Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/1/2024) (ndt) (Entered: 08/01/2024)

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Come now KALIQ BRYANT, and Defendant., Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, as successor to DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, to file this Joint Status Report.

1.      A brief statement of the nature of the case including the contention of the parties.

a.       Plaintiff’s Contentions:

Plaintiff acquired the property the subject of this suit Plaintiff acquired the property from the foreclosure purchaser.

The property was foreclosed by the governing home owners association.

The party foreclosed by the HOA bought the property at a HOA sale where the borrower lost the property.

Plaintiff contends that the public record reflects that it is highly likely that the statute of limitations proscribes the exercise of the powers of sale under the deed of trust.

b.      Defendant’s Contentions:

On November 24, 2003, James Daughterty (“Borrower”) executed a Note and a Deed of Trust that secured repayment of the Note with a lien against the real property commonly known as 4619 O’Connor, Irving, Texas 75062 (“Property”).

Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC is the holder of the Note and the beneficiary of the Deed of Trust through a chain of assignments from the original lender.

Borrower defaulted on his obligations under the Note, and Defendant mailed the requisite notice demanding the default be cured. Borrower failed to cure the default, and Defendant, through its foreclosure counsel, accelerated the maturity of the debt.

Defendant contends that it has a superior lien to the Plaintiff who acquired is interest through a junior lien HOA foreclosure sale. Defendant has asserted a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment and order allowing non-judicial foreclosure of the Property.

Defendant affirmatively states that it is not barred by the 4-year statute of limitations to foreclose.

A detailed procedural history explaining the basis for Defendant’s affirmative defenses relating to tolling and abandonment will be provided in detail in subsequent pleadings.

2.      Any challenge to jurisdiction or venue.

None

3.      Any Pending Motions.

None

4.      Any matters which require a conference with the court.

None

5.      Likelihood that other parties will be joined or the pleadings amended.

Defendant intends to join the Borrower via a Third-Party Petition.

6.      (a) An estimate of the time needed for discovery, with reasons, (b) a specification of the subjects on which discovery may be needed, and (c) whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focused upon particular issues.

(a) The parties estimate that six months will be sufficient for discovery. (b)

The subject central to this case is whether the mortgage note was accelerated, and if so when; and if the note was accelerated, was such acceleration abandoned, and if so when and by what manner. (c) Discovery in phases is not necessary.

The parties suggest that six months would be sufficient to produce documents and to take depositions that are indicated.

7.      Any issues related to disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information.

None

8.      Any issues related to claims of privilege or of protection as trail preparation material.

Defendant suggests that documents relevant to this case may contain confidential information whose contents should be subject to a protective order. The parties believe that they will enter into an agreed protective order to be submitted to the Court.

9.      What changes, if any, should be made to the limitations on discovery imposed under the Federal rules or by local rules.

None

10.  Any other orders that should be entered by the Court under Rule 26(c) or Rule 16(b) and (c).

As stated above, the parties anticipate presenting an agreed protective order to protect confidential borrower information.

11.  Proposed deadlines with specific dates that limit the time to (a) join other parties and amend pleadings; (b) file motions, including summary judgment and other dispositive motions; (c) complete discovery and (d) designate expert witnesses and make the expert disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(2).

(a)    Join other Parties and Amend Pleadings- – -9/1/2024

(b)   Filing of motions including motions for summary judgment – – -3/1/2025

(c)    Complete Discovery – – -3/1/2025

(d)   Designate expert witnesses and make expert disclosures – – 10/1/2024.

12.  Requested trial dates, estimated length of trial and whether jury has been demanded.

Requested trial date: May, 2025 Length of trial:                             1 day

Jury demand?              No

13.  Whether the parties will consent to trial by magistrate judge.

No

14.  Progress made toward settlement, and the present status of settlement negotiations.

The parties held a preliminary discussion about the issues in the case at the Rule 26 conference.

No substantive settlement discussions have been held to date.

The parties have agreed to do so after exchanging initial discovery.

15.  What form of alternative dispute resolution would be most appropriate.

The parties believe that a settlement conference presided over by a magistrate judge would be useful and most likely to lead to a successful outcome.

16.  Any other matters relevant to the status and disposition of this case.

None at this time.

Respectively submitted,

/s/ KENNETH S. HARTER

KENNETH S. HARTER
State Bar ID 09155300

Law Offices of Kenneth S. Harter
6160 Warren Pkwy Suite 100
Frisco, Tx. 75034
(972) 752-1928
Fax (214) 206-1491
ken@kenharter.com

Attorneys for Khaliq Bryant

and

: /s/ Crystal G. Gibson

CRYSTAL G. GIBSON
Texas Bar No. 24027322

cgibson@mwzmlaw.com

MACKIE WOLF ZIENTZ & MANN, P. C.
14160 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75254
(214) 635-2650
(214) 635-2686 (Fax)

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served on the following via ECF Notification on July 29, 2024:

Kenneth S. Harter
Law Offices of Kenneth S. Harter
6160 Warren Pkwy Suite 100
Frisco, Tx. 75034 ken@kenharter.com

/s/ Crystal G. Gibson
CRYSTAL G. GIBSON

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Crystal Gee Gibson on behalf of Ditech Financial LLC.

05/17/2024

52

Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 05/17/2024)

05/20/2024

53

ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 52 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. The Court ORDERS that Attorney Mark D. Cronenwett be withdrawn as counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, as successor to Ditech Financial, LLC in this cause. Attorney Nicholas M. Frame of Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann P.C. will remain as counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, as successor to Ditech Financial, LLC. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/20/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 05/20/2024)

U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Dallas)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:22-cv-00252-B

Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC
Assigned to: Judge Jane J Boyle

Case in other court:  44th Judicial District Court Dallas County TX, DC-22-00465

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Date Filed: 02/02/2022
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 290 Real Property: All Other Real Property
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Plaintiff
Khaliq Bryant represented by Kenneth Stuart Harter
Law Offices of Kenneth S Harter
6160 Warren Drive
Suite 100
Frisco, TX 75034
972-752-1928
Fax: 214-206-1491
Email: ken@kenharter.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Ditech Financial LLC represented by Mark D Cronenwett
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
2100 Ross Avenue
Suite 2000
Dallas, TX 75201
214-722-7100
Email: mark.cronenwett@lewisbrisbois.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDCrystal Gee Gibson
Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann PC
Litigation
14160 Dallas Parkway
Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75254
214-635-2670
Fax: 214-635-2686
Email: cgibson@mwzmlaw.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Consol Defendant
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC represented by Nicholas Michael Frame
Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann PC
5177 Richmond Ave
Suite 1230
Houston, TX 77056
713-730-3219
Fax: 214-635-2686
Email: nframe@mwzmlaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDMark D Cronenwett
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/20/2024
Consol Counter Claimant
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC represented by Nicholas Michael Frame
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDMark D Cronenwett
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/20/2024
Consol Counter Defendant
Khaliq Bryant represented by Kenneth Stuart Harter
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Counter Claimant
Ditech Financial LLC
TERMINATED: 04/19/2023
represented by Crystal Gee Gibson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDMark D Cronenwett
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/20/2024
V.
Counter Defendant
Khaliq Bryant
TERMINATED: 04/19/2023
represented by Kenneth Stuart Harter
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Counter Claimant
Ditech Financial LLC represented by Crystal Gee Gibson
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDMark D Cronenwett
(See above for address)
TERMINATED: 05/20/2024
V.
Counter Defendant
Khaliq Bryant represented by Kenneth Stuart Harter
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
02/02/2022 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Ditech Financial, LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12572474) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements and Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s), # 2 Cover Sheet, # 3 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/02/2022)
02/02/2022 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ditech Financial, LLC. (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/02/2022)
02/02/2022 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) (Entered: 02/03/2022)
02/09/2022 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Ditech Financial LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge., COUNTERCLAIM against Khaliq Bryant filed by Ditech Financial LLC (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/09/2022)
02/11/2022 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Ditech Financial LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
02/11/2022 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Ditech Financial LLC re 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
02/11/2022 7 Appendix in Support filed by Ditech Financial LLC re 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s)) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/11/2022)
03/02/2022 8 RESPONSE filed by Khaliq Bryant re: 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/02/2022)
03/14/2022 9 REPLY filed by Ditech Financial LLC re: 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 03/14/2022)
03/17/2022 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff’s answer or responsive pleading to Defendant’s counterclaim (see Doc. 4 , filed February 9, 2022) was due March 3, 2022. The Court therefore ORDERS Defendant to file its answer or responsive pleading on or before March 30, 2022, or SHOW CAUSE, in writing, for its failure to do so. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/17/2022) (chmb) (Entered: 03/17/2022)
03/17/2022 11 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by Khaliq Bryant. Related document: 4 Answer to Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/17/2022)
06/15/2022 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. Bryant’s quiet title claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court GRANTS LEAVE to Bryant to file an Amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies identified above, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 6/15/2022) (mla) (Entered: 06/15/2022)
06/16/2022 13 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 7/15/2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 6/16/2022) (svc) (Entered: 06/16/2022)
07/08/2022 14 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time file amended complaint filed by Khaliq Bryant (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Amendment) (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 07/08/2022)
07/08/2022 15 Joint STATUS REPORT /Case Management Plan, filed by Ditech Financial LLC. (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 07/08/2022)
07/08/2022 16 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 14 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff’s deadline to file an Amended Complaint is now on or before August 15, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/8/2022) (chmb) (Entered: 07/08/2022)
08/16/2022 17 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that on or before Friday, August 19, 2022, Plaintiff must SHOW CAUSE, in writing, for his failure to timely file an Amended Complaint or a notice of dismissal. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/16/2022) (svc) (Entered: 08/17/2022)
08/17/2022 18 RESPONSE filed by Khaliq Bryant re: 17 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/17/2022)
08/17/2022 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ditech Financial LLC filed by Khaliq Bryant. (One or more defendant(s) is no longer named.) Summons(es) not requested at this time. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/17/2022)
08/30/2022 20 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by Ditech Financial LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 08/30/2022)
08/30/2022 21 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Ditech Financial LLC re 20 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 08/30/2022)
09/19/2022 22 RESPONSE filed by Khaliq Bryant re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 09/19/2022)
10/03/2022 23 REPLY filed by Ditech Financial LLC re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 10/03/2022)
10/12/2022 24 Supplemental Document by Ditech Financial LLC as to 23 Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint,,. (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 10/12/2022)
12/02/2022 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 20 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Ditech Financial LLC is Granted. Thus, Bryant’s quiet title claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Additionally, the Court GRANTS LEAVE to Bryant to file a Second Amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies identified above, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/2/2022) (svc) (Entered: 12/02/2022)
01/09/2023 26 ***UNFILED per Order. See 29 ****AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ditech Financial LLC filed by Khaliq Bryant. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Harter, Kenneth) Modified on 1/10/2023 (svc). (Entered: 01/09/2023)
01/09/2023 27 ***UNFILED per Order. See 28 *** AMENDED ANSWER to 4 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim, filed by Khaliq Bryant (Harter, Kenneth) Modified on 1/10/2023 (svc). (Entered: 01/09/2023)
01/09/2023 28 ORDER STRIKING/UNFILING PLEADING: The Court has independently determined that 27 AMENDED ANSWER to 4 Answer to Complaint & Counterclaim should be stricken and unfiled. See LR 15.1(a) and (b). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/9/2023) (svc) (Entered: 01/10/2023)
01/09/2023 29 ORDER STRIKING/UNFILING PLEADING: The Court has independently determined that Amended Complaint 26 should be stricken and unfiled. Accordingly, it is ordered that the document(s) is/are stricken from the record of this case, and the Clerk is directed to note on the docket that the document(s) has/have been unfiled. The deadline to file an Amended Complaint has passed. See Doc. 25 . A motion for leave to file is required. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/9/2023) (svc) (Entered: 01/10/2023)
01/10/2023 30 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File 2ND AM. COMPLAINT filed by Khaliq Bryant (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order order granting leave) (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/10/2023)
01/11/2023 31 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 30 Motion for Leave to File. (The requesting party must file the document with the clerk.) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/11/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 01/11/2023)
01/11/2023 32 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ditech Financial LLC filed by Khaliq Bryant. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/11/2023)
01/13/2023 33 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Ditech Financial LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
01/13/2023 34 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Ditech Financial LLC re 33 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
01/13/2023 35 Appendix in Support filed by Ditech Financial LLC re 33 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s)) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
02/04/2023 36 RESPONSE filed by Khaliq Bryant re: 33 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/04/2023)
02/17/2023 37 REPLY filed by Ditech Financial LLC re: 33 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 02/17/2023)
03/23/2023 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS 33 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by (SLS)Ditech Financial LLC. Bryants claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/23/2023) (svc) (Entered: 03/23/2023)
03/23/2023 39 BILL OF COSTS by Ditech Financial LLC. (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 03/23/2023)
03/27/2023 40 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 4/17/2023. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/27/2023) (svc) (Entered: 03/28/2023)
04/06/2023 41 Costs Taxed in amount of $ 402.00 against Plaintiff. (ykp) (Entered: 04/06/2023)
04/17/2023 42 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report filed by Ditech Financial LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 04/17/2023)
04/18/2023 43 AMENDED DOCUMENT Certificate of Conference by Ditech Financial LLC. Amendment to 42 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report. (Cronenwett, Mark) Modified text on 4/19/2023 (mms). (Entered: 04/18/2023)
04/18/2023 44 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report. The deadline to file the joint status report is now on or before April 27, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 4/18/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 04/18/2023)
04/19/2023 45 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Ditech Financial LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 04/19/2023)
04/22/2023 46 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Fifth Circuit by Khaliq Bryant. Filing fee $505, receipt number ATXNDC-13686418. T.O. form to appellant electronically at Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/22/2023)
04/27/2023 47 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Ditech Financial LLC. (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 04/27/2023)
03/01/2024 48 Opinion of USCA in accordance with USCA judgment re 46 Notice of Appeal filed by Khaliq Bryant. (mcrd) (Entered: 04/22/2024)
03/01/2024 49 JUDGMENT of USCA as to 46 Notice of Appeal filed by Khaliq Bryant. It is Ordered and Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is REVERSED. Issued as Mandate: 3/1/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Additional Page(s) USCA Letter) (mcrd) (Entered: 04/22/2024)
05/03/2024 50 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:24-cv-746 consolidated with lead case 3:22-cv-0252. Khaliq Bryan and Specialized Loan Servicing LLC added to case pursuant to consolidation. The Clerk is directed to REOPEN Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC, No. 3-22-cv-0252-B. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 5/3/2024) (agc) (Entered: 05/06/2024)
05/17/2024 51 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nicholas Michael Frame on behalf of Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Frame, Nicholas) (Entered: 05/17/2024)
05/17/2024 52 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Cronenwett, Mark) (Entered: 05/17/2024)
05/20/2024 53 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 52 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. The Court ORDERS that Attorney Mark D. Cronenwett be withdrawn as counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, as successor to Ditech Financial, LLC in this cause. Attorney Nicholas M. Frame of Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann P.C. will remain as counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, as successor to Ditech Financial, LLC. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/20/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 05/20/2024)
06/10/2024 54 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On May 3, 2024, this Court consolidated Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC (3:22-cv-0252-B) and Bryant v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (3:24-cv-0746-B). Doc. 50, Order. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff Khaliq Bryant to file an amended complaint that consolidates its allegations and claims against Defendant Ditech Financial, LLC and Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC into a single pleading. Plaintiff’s amended complaint must be filed on or before June 28, 2024. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s amended complaint within 21 days after the amended complaint is filed. In addition, the Court notes that, prior to consolidation, Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC filed a counterclaim against Plaintiff. That pleading, however, is not docketed in the present case. Accordingly, the Court also ORDERS Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC to file an amended counterclaim by June 28, 2024. Plaintiff must answer or otherwise respond to Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC’s amended counterclaim within 21 days after the amended counterclaim is filed. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 6/10/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 06/10/2024)
06/18/2024 55 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT per court order 53 against Ditech Financial LLC, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC filed by Khaliq Bryant. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Harter, Kenneth) Modified text on 6/20/2024 (ykp). (Entered: 06/18/2024)
06/28/2024 56 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Crystal Gee Gibson on behalf of Ditech Financial LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 06/28/2024)
06/28/2024 57 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Third Amended Complaint and Amended Counterclaim filed by Ditech Financial LLC (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Attorney Crystal Gee Gibson added to party Ditech Financial LLC(pty:dft) (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 06/28/2024)
07/02/2024 58 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 57 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Khaliq Bryant’s Third Amended Complaint by July 5, 2024. In addition, Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC’s amended counterclaim must also be filed by July 5, 2024. Plaintiff must answer or otherwise respond to Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC’s amended counterclaim within 21 days after the amended counterclaim is filed. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/2/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 07/02/2024)
07/05/2024 59 ANSWER to 55 Amended Complaint,, filed by Ditech Financial LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge., Amended COUNTERCLAIM against Khaliq Bryant filed by Ditech Financial LLC (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 07/05/2024)
07/10/2024 60 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Joint Status Report due by 7/31/2024. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/10/2024) (kcr) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
07/23/2024 61 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by Khaliq Bryant. Related document: 59 Answer to Amended Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, (Harter, Kenneth) (Entered: 07/23/2024)
07/29/2024 62 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Ditech Financial LLC. (Gibson, Crystal) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
08/01/2024 63 SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial beginning Monday 10/27/2025 before Judge Jane J Boyle. Joinder of Parties due by 9/2/2024. Amended Pleadings due by 9/2/2024. Motions due by 3/3/2025. Discovery due by 3/3/2025. Deadline for mediation is on or before 5/30/2025. Pretrial Order due by 10/14/2025. Pretrial Materials due by 10/14/2025. Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2025 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J Boyle. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/1/2024) (ndt) (Entered: 08/01/2024)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
08/26/2024 09:09:29

Bryant v. DiTech Fin.

No. 23-10416

(5th Cir. Mar. 1, 2024)

Texas Appellate Justice Ken Molberg: Statute of Limitations Suspended During Litigation and Appeal

That differs when you are in Federal Court on Appeal. It didn’t stop PHH and Mark Cronenwett from filing for nonjudicial foreclosure.

Justice in the Wild West: One Fearless Widow’s Battle for Truth and Honor in the Federal Courthouse

The Texas Struggle: Defying Northern Banking Giants and Their Bounty Hunting Lawyers to Protect Her Home from Rustlers and Thieves

Including the How: Addressing the Missing Piece in Quoting Fraud with Specificity

In Plaintiff’s prior response, under section F. Burke Fails to Assert a Claim for Fraud, the How element was inadvertently omitted.

Reversed: Fifth Circuit Judge Andy Oldham Rejects Ditech Foreclosure Attempts As Time-Barred
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top