Editors Choice

Meanwhile in California, a Judge Faces Disciplinary Commission for Six Counts of Judicial Misconduct

The California Commission on Judicial Performance confirmed that it would move forward with formal proceedings against Judge Jeffrey Bennett of the Ventura County Superior Court.

foreclosure

LIT COMMENTARY

March 28, 2020 Breaking News Update:

In a 44 page report, the end result of the Judicial investigation is a slap for this sexist, racist judge Jeff Bennett in California.

Judge is censured for ‘crass’ and ‘sexist’ remarks, comment with ‘racial overtones’

Originally Published: March 26, 2020

A California judge has been censured after commenting on “smoking hot” women, proclaiming that he had the “biggest balls in the courthouse” and making other inappropriate remarks.

Judge Jeffrey Bennett of Ventura County stipulated to the allegations and agreed to the reprimand, report Law.com and Law360.

The California Commission on Judicial Performance released its March 10 decision and reprimand order on Wednesday.

“Judge Bennett’s misconduct mostly involves saying things no judge should say—comments and remarks that are offensive, undignified, discourteous, dishonest, sexist, profane, and create the appearance of bias and retaliation,” the commission said.

In addition, Bennett’s comment to a black defendant “reflects a disregard for the racial overtones of such a remark and manifests insensitivity to individuals appearing in court before him,” the commission said.

Bennett had told the black defendant he should stop “shucking and jiving” after the defendant gave what Bennett believed to be evasive answers.

The commission also said that Bennett:

Said in front of a prosecutor that he was the “only one in the courthouse with the balls to make a ruling,” or words to that effect. He also told attorneys in a courthouse hallway something to the effect of: “I have the biggest balls in the courthouse. I’m probably the only judge who has the balls to admit when I’ve made the wrong decision.”

Said in a courtroom conversation that “chicks” really liked the Rolls-Royce he had washed for the owner and driven to a coffee shop. He also told a prosecutor and lawyer in chambers that he wouldn’t spend so much time with the telescope he installed on his roof if he had “a 20-year-old smoking hot blonde wife,” or words to that effect.

Told lawyers in his chambers that he prefers to take his flu shot “in the ass,” told a prosecutor in chambers that she was taking a “chicken shit position,” and told two prosecutors that another prosecutor handling a hearing before him was “dumb as shit.”

Told lawyers during a trial that he didn’t care about them, but he did care about jurors because they are voters.

Excluded evidence from the state attorney general’s office and told the prosecutor who objected, “You can tell [California Attorney General Xavier] Becerra that’s what he gets for going against my president,” or words to that effect.

Told a prosecutor after a hearing that she didn’t have to “act like a scared little girl in my courtroom.”

Told a prosecutor he wasn’t sure if he wanted to shake his hand because the judge believed the prosecutor was the source of a prior complaint to the judicial commission. Bennett falsely stated he spent $10,000 for his defense in the matter.

Used the words “f- – -ing” and “shit” in an in-chambers meeting with lawyers.

Judges are “expected to display appropriate demeanor and decorum, and not to use crass or sexist words and imagery, as Judge Bennett has done,” the commission said.

“For example, Judge Bennett’s references to his ‘balls’ and his ‘ass’ diminish the dignity of his office. His gratuitous comments about ‘chicks’ liking a car, and to not spending so much time with his telescope if he had a “20-year-old smoking hot wife,’ are sexist and unseemly. His use of profanity, such as ‘f- – -ing’ and ‘shit,’ degrades the decorum of the court and reflects negatively on the judiciary. …

“Finally, Judge Bennett’s pattern of undignified, discourteous, and offensive remarks to and about prosecutors not only creates the appearance of bias against them, but also undermines public perception of the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”

The commission said Bennett’s acknowledgement of almost every ethics allegation was a significant mitigating factor. An aggravating factor was a prior advisory letter he received for making discourteous and undignified remarks.

The advisory letter concerned these remarks to a defendant: “He’s a dirtbag of the highest order … What’s kind of burning me up right now is the fact that he was paid more than I’m paid to sell cars, and then he stole money on top of it. How pathetic is that? You are really a piece of work.”

According to Law.com, Bennett’s lawyers at Klinedinst have described him as a “straightforward and honest” man with a “refreshing ‘tell-it-like-it-is’ approach to life.”

In a statement, the lawyers said Bennett “has accepted this censure, taken full responsibility for his conduct, and is committed to improving as a judicial officer.”

California judge faces misconduct charges spanning eight years

March 6, 2020

A California judge faces six counts of misconduct for engaging in “undignified, discourteous and offensive sexualized (or otherwise crude)” behavior and making improper comments to defendants, lawyers and courthouse staff over a period of eight years, according to the state’s judicial disciplinary commission.

In its Monday notice, the California Commission on Judicial Performance confirmed that it would move forward with formal proceedings against Judge Jeffrey Bennett of the Ventura County Superior Court. He was given 20 days to answer the charges against him and could face private admonishment up to removal from office, Law.com reports.

The commission’s complaint details incidents from 2010 to 2018, including one in 2015 in which an African American defendant appeared before Bennett with an outstanding warrant on a felony. When Bennett thought the defendant was evading his questions, he told him to stop “shucking and jiving,” the complaint said.

In another 2015 incident, Bennett presided over a case in which the defendant was charged with disturbing the peace. When the deputy district attorney asked for a stay-away order for the victim, the judge said that was “a chicken-shit position to have” and such charges wouldn’t be tolerated when he became the judge in the master calendar department, the complaint said.

Bennett also repeatedly said he was “the only one in the courthouse with the balls to make a ruling,” and once, while seated on the bench and wearing his judicial robe, told a personal story about driving a Rolls Royce, the complaint said. The judge said “chicks really dug that car” and that “it had a big back seat, if you know what I mean,” it added.

He is also accused in the complaint of telling attorneys to see a specific dental hygienist because she was “a smoking hot 10” and that he would let her “do whatever she wanted” to him.

Bennett’s attorneys, Heather Rosing, Dan Agle and Irean Zhan, said in a statement provided to Law.com that the judge was “straightforward and honest” with a “refreshing ‘tell it like it is’ approach to life.”

“Prior to the initiation of formal proceedings, Judge Bennett admitted he had made inappropriate comments,” his attorneys said. “He sincerely apologized to the commission and implemented a thoughtfully developed plan for improvement and change.”

Bennett, a former police officer who joined the Ventura County district attorney’s office in 1989, was elected to the bench in 2008.

Donation Information

Donor Information

How did you hear about LIT?

Please insert all the required fields
Please insert correct email
Please fill in a valid amount

Meanwhile in California, a Judge Faces Disciplinary Commission for Six Counts of Judicial Misconduct
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

texas lawyers

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Copyright © 2020 Laws In Texas. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top