Editors Choice

Video or a Mirage: Judge Throws the Constitution in His Meltdown On the Bench

We are mindful that district court judges are often faced with a myriad of excuses from prospective jurors who wish to avoid sitting on a jury, the Nevada Supreme Court said. It is clear from the judge’s comments and behavior that he was frustrated by the prospective juror’s explanation.

New trial ordered after judge allegedly threw pocket Constitution during voir dire outburst

The Nevada Supreme Court has ordered a new trial for a man convicted of multiple sex offenses against children because the judge in the case created an “intimidating atmosphere” during voir dire questioning of potential jurors.

According to the state supreme court, the judge “threw a book against the wall, cursed, and berated, yelled at, and threatened a prospective juror for expressing her belief that she could not be impartial.”

The thrown book was a pocket Constitution, and the judge was Judge Richard Scotti of Las Vegas, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports. The Nevada Appeal also has coverage of the Sept. 5 opinion.

The court ruled in the case of Jose Azucena, who was convicted of 25 felonies and five gross misdemeanors, including sexual assault of a minor younger than age 14 and first-degree kidnapping, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Azucena was accused of luring children to his apartment with candy before molesting them, according to previous coverage by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Scotti berated the potential juror after she stated that she didn’t think she could be unbiased because of her exposure to child abuse in her work as a nurse, according to the state supreme court. This colloquy followed:

The court: So you didn’t say that yesterday. All right.

Prospective Juror No. 177: Well, I said I had other issues.

The court: No, listen, what—what we’re not going to have in this jury is people coming in overnight and thinking up shit and try to make shit up now so they can get out of the jury. That’s not going to happen. All right. All right. Because if I find that someone said something yesterday under oath and changes it because they’re trying to fabricate something to get out of serving on this jury, there’s going to be repercussions. All right.”

The potential juror continued to tell the judge that she said she had other issues the day before.

The court: All right. So—so why you got issues? Why can’t you—you’re, you’re saying that you can’t be fair and impartial to both sides. You’re going to completely throw out our entire justice system because you don’t want to be fair and impartial.”

Video shows that the judge threw a book at the wall during the last statement, the court said.

The next juror who was questioned said she was sexually abused as a child, but she could be fair and impartial.

During a break, the defense counsel moved to dismiss the entire jury venire because the judge’s scolding could have a chilling effect on potential jurors who could fear disclosing biases. The judge denied the motion as “ludicrous.”

“We are mindful that district court judges are often faced with a myriad of excuses from prospective jurors who wish to avoid sitting on a jury,” the Nevada Supreme Court said. “It is clear from the judge’s comments and behavior that he was frustrated by the prospective juror’s explanation.”

“While we recognize the frustration that the judge experienced, it was inappropriate to throw a book and curse and yell at the prospective juror,” the court said. “Because the judge created an atmosphere of intimidation and did nothing to alleviate the impact of his behavior, we cannot be confident that an impartial jury was selected.”

Scotti responded to the decision Thursday, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported.

“First and foremost, I regret what happened, obviously,” Judge Scotti said. “Despite that incident, I do have tremendous respect for our jury system and all of our jurors and our potential jurors.”

Judge throws book, Nevada Supreme Court orders new trial

The Nevada Supreme Court this week ordered a new trial for a man convicted of multiple sex offenses against children because of the district judge’s misconduct during jury selection.

According to the ruling, Clark County District Judge Richard Scotti cursed and berated, yelled at the potential juror and threatened her, throwing a book against the courtroom wall because she said she couldn’t be impartial in the trial.

Saying that may have seriously discouraged other prospective jurors from answering honestly about their own biases, “we cannot be convinced that an impartial jury was selected under these circumstances where the judge did nothing to alleviate the intimidating atmosphere that he created.”

Jose Azucena was charged with multiple sex offenses against children and the juror in question told the judge she didn’t think she could be unbiased because she had to deal with child abuse and sexual assault in her work as a nurse.

The judge objected saying she didn’t say that the day before adding that, “what we’re not going to have in this jury is people coming in overnight and thinking s— up and try to make s— up now so they can get out of the jury.”

“You’re going to completely throw out our entire justice system because you don’t want to be fair and impartial,” he charged, throwing a book against the courtroom wall to emphasize his point.

Defense counsel tried to intervene asking to approach the bench but Scotti refused.

“Go home, all right. I don’t like your attitude,” he told her.

Defense counsel then moved to dismiss the entire jury pool saying the judge’s behavior and language had a “chilling effect” on the rest of the jury. Scotti denied the motion as “ludicrous.”

The opinion by Justices James Hardesty, Lidia Stiglich and Abbi Silver agreed with the defense that the judge’s misconduct interfered with Azucena’s right to a fair and impartial trial.

“Because the judge created an atmosphere of intimidation and did nothing to alleviate the impact of his behavior, we cannot be confident that an impartial jury was selected,” the opinion states.

They ordered a new trial for the defendant.

Ken Paxton and The Ice Cream Man

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is under FBI investigation over claims of using his office to help a political donor, gave a job in recent months to another supporter.

Penn. AG Josh Shapiro Targets Texas AG Ken Paxton

Shapiro claims Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is absolutely unfit to serve, and certainly violated his oath in an attempt to merely suck up to a corrupt president,

Sen. Angela Paxton Staying Silent as Adulterous Hubby and Devout Christian Ken Paxton Faces Financial Ruin

The whistleblowers also allege Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton may have helped Nate Paul because the developer gave a job to a woman with whom he had an extramarital relationship.

Video or a Mirage: Judge Throws the Constitution in His Meltdown On the Bench
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top