Twitter loses legal battle in user surveillance transparency lawsuit

Twitter lost its six-year legal battle to let the public know exactly how many requests it received from the FBI to snoop on private user accounts.

A federal judge said Friday the government convinced her that granting the request “would be likely to lead to grave or imminent harm to the national security.

”Twitter broke ranks with other large internet companies, including Facebook and Google in 2014 when it balked at the government’s order that it only reveal the number of national security letters — basically search warrants — in aggregate numbers of 1,000.It sued to be allowed to publish the precise number as part of a planned “transparency report” and argued that being prohibited from doing so violated its free speech rights.

After years of litigation that spanned the tenures of four US attorneys general — Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Jeff Sessions and William Barr — US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted the government’s request to dismiss the lawsuit.

She wrote in an 11-page ruling that the Justice Department had shown — in part through the use of confidential declarations — that releasing the precise number of national security letters from 2014 — which is what Twitter wanted to do — posed a national security risk.

“When a motion to disqualify a judge is “based on the judge’s ownership interest in certain real estate, the public must be able to learn the location of that property so as to be able to effectively understand and investigate the merits of the motion” https://t.co/aAIboInB8C pic.twitter.com/EovhwU1JjW

— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) March 7, 2020