Editors Choice

Criminal Trial II After Fifth Circuit Appeal Finds Corrupt Laura Jordan and Dowry Hubby Guilty, Again

Our elected officials are held to the highest standards, and former Mayor Laura Jordan traded her responsibility to serve her constituents to enjoy a stream of financial benefits.

Former North Texas Mayor and Land Developer Husband Convicted in Public Corruption Trial

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of Texas

Saturday, July 24, 2021

SHERMAN, Texas – The former mayor of Richardson, Texas, and a land developer whom she married post-indictment but in advance of trial, have been convicted of federal bribery and tax fraud violations in the Eastern District of Texas, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei today.

Laura Jordan, also known as Laura Maczka, 56, and Mark Jordan, 54, both of Plano, Texas were found guilty by a jury following a three-week trial before U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant III.  Both defendants were found guilty of bribery concerning a program receiving federal funds, conspiracy to commit bribery concerning a program receiving federal funds, tax fraud, and conspiracy to commit tax fraud.

“The cornerstone of a representative democracy is that citizens can rely on their elected officials to wield their official powers in a way that furthers the best interests of the community, rather than to benefit their friends and cronies,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.

“Today’s verdict will go a long way towards bolstering public confidence in the integrity of our democratic institutions and promoting open and honest governance.  I thank the jury for their service and commend the investigative and prosecutorial team for their tenacity and professionalism.”

“Ultimately, the trust of the citizens of Richardson was betrayed by Laura and Mark Jordan,”

said Dallas FBI Special Agent in Charge Matthew J. DeSarno.

“Our elected officials are held to the highest standards, and Laura Jordan traded her responsibility to serve her constituents to enjoy a stream of financial benefits.  The FBI and our partners will continue to ensure that those who violate their obligation to the public are held fully accountable.”

According to information presented in court, from May 2013 through April 2015, Maczka was the mayor of Richardson, Texas, and Jordan was a land developer.  Maczka and Jordan conspired to devise and execute a scheme to commit bribery.

Maczka, contrary to her campaign promises, supported and repeatedly voted for controversial zoning changes sought by Jordan, ultimately allowing for the construction of over 1,000 new apartments in Richardson near other Richardson neighborhoods. In exchange, Jordan paid Maczka over $18,000 in cash, an additional $40,000 by check, and paid for over $24,000 in renovations to Maczka’s home.

Jordan also paid for luxury hotel stays and airfare upgrades for Maczka, and provided Maczka lucrative employment at one of Jordan’s companies.  According to court testimony, Maczka and Jordan failed to disclose to the public that they had coordinated to affect the zoning changes Jordan wanted and that Jordan had provided a stream of benefits to Maczka.

Maczka and Jordan were indicted by a federal grand jury on May 10, 2018.  Maczka and Jordan each face up to 10 years in federal prison.

The maximum statutory sentences prescribed by Congress are provided here for information purposes, as the sentencings will be determined by the court based on the advisory sentencing guidelines and other statutory factors.  Sentencing hearings will be scheduled after the completion of presentence investigations by the U.S. Probation Office.

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Heather Rattan, Sean Taylor, Brent Andrus, and other attorneys from the Plano branch office.

Here’s the Recap of the First Trial’s Reversal by the Fifth Circuit Last Year

United States v. Jordan, No. 19-40499 (5th Cir. May 1, 2020)




The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of defendants’ motion for a new trial on the basis of prejudicial outside influence on the jury.

The court held that the district court did not abuse its broad discretion in granting the motion for a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing.

To the extent there is a bright-line rule applicable to allegations of outside influence on the jury, the court held that it was not applicable to this case. Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in exercising its prerogative, within broadly defined parameters, to handle the allegation of outside influence in the least disruptive manner possible in this unusual case.

Finally, the district court permissibly concluded that the evidence showed a sufficient likelihood of prejudice to shift the burden to the Government, and that the Government did not (and could not) show “no reasonable possibility that the jury’s verdict was influenced by” the CSO’s

The Deleted Opinion: After the Before From the Dishonorable Fifth Circuit

Non prisoner Lamell obtains a partial reversal in his favor from a 3-panel which capitulated from their earlier opinion. LIT investigates why.

The Inequity of Texas Law When Chief Judges are Literally Bedding Down Together is Criminal

Supreme Chief Justice Nathan Hecht and Fifth Circuit Chief Judge Priscilla Owen to Marry. Recent opinions from Certified Questions in Doubt.

Unmasked: A Judicial Complaint Against “The Brain Surgeon” Will Be Dismissed Without a Glance

Fix the Court’s letter is naive when addressing the judges on this panel. Roth clearly shows a lack of experience with the Ochlocracy at CA5.

Criminal Trial II After Fifth Circuit Appeal Finds Corrupt Laura Jordan and Dowry Hubby Guilty, Again
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top