Creech v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
(4:25-cv-01734)
District Court, S.D. Texas, Judge Keith Ellison
APR 15, 2025 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 23, 2025
APR 23, 2025
Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.
Removed to federal court.
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/8/2025 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (bmn4) (Entered: 04/16/2025)
| RWB |
U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:25-cv-01734
| Creech v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Assigned to: Judge Keith P Ellison
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Date Filed: 04/15/2025 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure Jurisdiction: Diversity |
| Plaintiff | ||
| Cindy Crane Creech | represented by | David Miller Medearis Medearis Law Firm, PLLC 1560 W. Bay Area Blvd. Ste 200 Friendswood, TX 77546 281-954-6270 Email: dmedearis@medearislaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
| V. | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-WL1, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WL1 |
represented by | Alfredo Ramos Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 1717 Main Street Suite 3626 Dallas, TX 75201 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDC Charles Townsend Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 1717 Main Street Suite 3625 Dallas, TX 75201 945-229-6370 Fax: 312-704-3001 Email: ctownsend@hinshawlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2025 | 1 | NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 334th Judicial District of Harris County, case number 2025-21942 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-33252167) filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-WL1, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WL1. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Index, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Townsend, C) (Entered: 04/15/2025) |
| 04/15/2025 | 2 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-WL1, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-WL1, filed. (Townsend, C) (Entered: 04/15/2025) |
| 04/16/2025 | 3 | CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4) (Entered: 04/16/2025) |
| 04/16/2025 | 4 | ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/8/2025 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (bmn4) (Entered: 04/16/2025) |
| PACER Service Center | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction Receipt | |||
| 04/23/2025 10:30:14 |
#LITAMO2025
The All Writs Act Vexatious Litigant Standard in Federal Courts is a Villainous Scheme to Silence Critics
Joseph Johnson and Margaret (deceased) have filed at least 8 bankruptcy proceedings, successfully thwarting foreclosure for a decade.https://t.co/skCu9dUGXK— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) April 23, 2025
202521942 –
CREECH, CINDY CRANE vs. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
(Court 334)
MAR 31, 2025 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 3, 2025
APR 3 14, 2025
Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.
#LITAMO2025
The Book of Lehman: Texas Felon On Paper Andrew ‘Thug with a JD’ Lehman Should be Revoked
Andrew Lehman is a risk to the community, revoke his bond. This Thug’s defining ID should be his newly assigned Texas Inmate number.
Laws In Texas 🔥 https://t.co/hYg4qkbzpg https://t.co/H3ovbdiPxJ— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) April 3, 2025
202424529 –
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs. CREECH, CINDY CRANE
(Court 129, JUDGE MICHAEL GOMEZ)
APR 16, 2024 – JAN 13, 2025 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 3, 2025
APR 3 14, 2025
Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.
The court order and many filings are sealed in the 736 lawsuit, in direct violation of Rule 76a.
Fourteenth Court of Appeals Asked: What the Heck Does Carry With the Case Actually Mean?
Appellees cannot comply with the above direction from the Court because there is no such permanent sealing order (Rule 76a).
Lehman Brothers Robosigned Note Resurfaces: LIT’s Yellowfin Fraud Series Digs Deeper
From the Absurd to the Astonishing: Expired Debt Collection, Open Docket Violation, and the Actions of a Rogue Collector for a Fl Debt Buyer.
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 76a in Focus: Appellate Court’s Ruling Sets Precedent, Agrees with LIT
Read a summary of an appellate court opinion highlighting the reversal of a sealing order in a civil case due to procedural malfeasance.
